Posted on 2 Comments

[:en]Truth = Reality[:]

[:en] 

You who build these altars now 

to sacrifice these children, 

you must not do it anymore. 

A scheme is not a vision 

and you never have been tempted 

by a demon or a god. 

You who stand above them now, 

your hatchets blunt and bloody, 

you were not there before, 

when I lay upon a mountain 

and my father’s hand was trembling 

with the beauty of the word. 

        –   Leonard Cohen 
              (from ‘The Story of Isaac’)

 

 

 

When we think of ‘the Truth’, we may well think of Telling the Truth … of NOT LYING.  

(and we have a name for people who speak the truth (and do not deceive);  we say that they are HONEST.

 

But if we are to have any chance of understanding the mind of our current president (the POTUS) … we will need to understand his relationship to (both) TRUTH … and REALITY.

 

But before trying that, let’s take a few steps back … for some CONTEXT.

 

The Requirements of Living confront us ALL.

 

We are (always) in some Situation or another.  And besides the particular situation, we are in a

‘Generic’ … a general situation.  Let’s call it the Basic Human Situation.  (And it’s to an aspect of this Basic situation … that I now draw your attention.)

 

The Tasks of Living are several  (five, perhaps). The first one is – that we are confronted with is the necessity of comprehending the Nature of our Situation.

 

So –

What’s the Nature of my Situation?

What are my Alternatives of Action?

How will the world unfold … if I choose this path, or that one?

What do I care about? / (Who do I love?)

Taking action.

 

Suppose, for example, that you are driving a car.  You’re driving at the speed of the cars around you (which happens to be pretty fast) … and then you come to a curve in the road.  Now, if the road surface happens to be slippery (with rain, or snow, or ice) then you would do well to take into account that your situation has changed.  It may be that reducing your speed is the choice that is needed to keep your car from skidding off the road or into the lane of oncoming traffic.  

 

We (routinely) depend upon a clear assessment of our Situation … to keep ourselves ALIVE.  

 

We should also take good care of our Repertoire of Choices … (and tend it as we would a rose garden.)  When we are driving, we should ask ourselves (often) – “Am I leaving enough distance in front of me? (leaving enough space between my car and the one ahead?)   “Am I driving slow enough?” Such choices keep us alive (and/or keep us from killing someone else !)

 

If we are driving, and our FAMILY is riding in our car, then we are especially careful.  Why? Because we love them.

 

As Rumi says –

 

Someone who does not run

toward the allure of love

walks a road where nothing lives. 

 

Life is ours

in as far as our lives are love-driven and love oriented.

 

And we strive to comprehend the Truth because we understand

that therein lies the power to make choices … to cause the events of the world

to unfold in such a way that the people we love will enjoy good health and (we hope) be happy.

 

And Truth has to do with Reality.

“Truth” is our apprehension of Reality.

When our comprehension of the nature of Reality approaches the way it really IS … then we say that we comprehend the truth.

 

Reality is what ‘The Truth’ is (always) ABOUT !

 

Truth = Reality.       Mmm?

 

And – by “Reality” … we mean:  That which IS.   That which exists ON ITS OWN.

 

The fact that Science exists (as a collective enterprise – a cooperative effort to understand the natural world) bears witness to our need (and the value) to understand Reality (the Truth).

 

And this Pursuit of the Truth (always) takes place in (what I described last week) as the Zone of Philosophy.

 

Normal people have a USE for (and are routinely INVOLVED in) the pursuit of truth (trying to understand the nature of our Situation / the nature of Reality.

 

Did you notice the emboldened line in the epigram?    (‘A scheme is not a vision’)?

 

Cohen is telling us – that when we are love-oriented (and we have a plan … a goal) to make the world better for its (beloved) inhabitants  … THAT IS A VISION. (such as Deganawida’s [deliberate] efforts to create the Iroquois Confederacy … and the Great Peace. This is an example of a Leader wanting [and creating] a better world.  A Vision.

 

But

What if you are completely Selfish?  Then all your plans and goals will be only to serve yourSELF !     In such a case, the best you will be able to come up with is … a “Scheme”!   Mmm?

 

THIS is why our Mr. Trump can not be a leader … Because he DOES NOT LOVE.

 

He has no Visions … only SCHEMES    (because he is Completely Selfish) He thinks everything is ABOUT HIM !

THAT’S how he LIVES HIS LIFE.

 

Adulation (& admiration, & fealty) are a poor substitute for Love.  But it’s the best thing he can come up with.

 

You can say that he is ‘narcissistic’ … or that he is a ‘pathological liar’ … but these terms will probably NOT help you to understand him.

 

He’s BEYOND that really.

 

He SAYS he is ‘Very Normal’ … but he is NOT normal.

 

As long as we think that he is (basically) like US … we will not understand him.

 

[If you want to understand him … I suggest you study ‘Lucifer’ (in the Urantia Book.  Info at end of essay.)]

Trump does NOT LIE … not in the way WE understand lying.  He does not have ANY relationship with the Truth.  

Because his sense of Reality (within his personal Schematic … his sense of his own Basic Situation) is completely disrupted    (or perhaps it’s been destroyed)

We have all heard people refer to “my truth” / (“It’s true for me.”) … which implies that we DO NOT LIVE IN THE SAME WORLD … that we do NOT SHARE A PUBLIC REALITY.

Donald Trump (the way he is RIGHT NOW) shows us where this line of thinking is heading.     For he has arrived.

 

We (most people) have a use for the truth.  We want to understand reality better, because we want to make our LIVES better.

 

But this is NOT how our Mr. Trump functions. He has NO INTEREST in the truth.  AT ALL.   BECAUSE he (thinks he) has NO USE for Reality.  

 

Everything (from his point of view) is ABOUT HIM.  He’s an emotional four-year old … who simply Wants what he Wants.  And he’s going to GET it, if he CAN.

 

And what does he want?  Money. Power. Influence.  Followers. Approval. Fealty.  Adulation.

 

Perhaps he has been “eaten” by (modern) Social Media.  Consider his Tweets.  I think THAT’S real to him.  He wants a following.  I think he has substituted (his base’s) perception of him for Reality.  For him – Perception is primary.

 

In the last few decades I have observed a shift in how this society regards Reality.  There has been a marked increase in the view that Perception is an important form of Primary Reality.  [Consider our increasing dependence upon public opinion polls.   Donald Trump has simply (within his own psyche) carried this trend to its (logical) conclusion.]

 

Each and every ONE of us knows something about Selfishness & Self-Absorption … because we are ALL afflicted with it.  We all do it.

 

But this is NOT WHERE TRUMP IS.

(That is … not Selfishness as we know it)

 

Narcissist?

Solipsist?

Compulsive Liar?

 

I suppose so … but none of these terms are adequate.

 

I think that “where he is”  (WHO he has become) … is now probably beyond our comprehension.

 

But I’m pretty sure – that it would NOT be worth going there

 … just in order to find out what it’s like.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

53. The Lucifer Rebellion

1. The Leaders of Rebellion
2. The Causes of Rebellion
3. The Lucifer Manifesto
4. Outbreak of the Rebellion
5. Nature of the Conflict
6. A Loyal Seraphic Commander
7. History of the Rebellion
8. The Son of Man on Urantia
9. Present Status of the Rebellion

54. Problems of the Lucifer Rebellion

1. True and False Liberty
2. The Theft of Liberty
3. The Time Lag of Justice
4. The Mercy Time Lag
5. The Wisdom of Delay                                            Twelve reasons

6. The Triumph of Love

– (excerpted from the Contents of The Urantia Book)

~ ~ ~

https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-53-lucifer-rebellion?term=%2253%22#U53_0_0

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Story of Isaac

  by    Leonard Cohen

The door it opened slowly, 

my father he came in, 

I was nine years old. 

And he stood so tall above me, 

his blue eyes they were shining 

and his voice was very cold. 

He said, “I’ve had a vision 

and you know I’m strong and holy, 

I must do what I’ve been told.” 

So he started up the mountain, 

I was running, he was walking, 

and his axe was made of gold. 

 

Well, the trees they got much smaller, 

the lake a lady’s mirror, 

we stopped to drink some wine. 

Then he threw the bottle over. 

Broke a minute later 

and he put his hand on mine. 

Thought I saw an eagle 

but it might have been a vulture, 

I never could decide. 

Then my father built an altar, 

he looked once behind his shoulder, 

he knew I would not hide. 

You who build these altars now 

to sacrifice these children, 

you must not do it anymore. 

A scheme is not a vision 

and you never have been tempted 

by a demon or a god. 

You who stand above them now, 

your hatchets blunt and bloody, 

you were not there before, 

when I lay upon a mountain 

and my father’s hand was trembling 

with the beauty of the word. 

And if you call me brother now, 

forgive me if I inquire, 

“Just according to whose plan?” 

When it all comes down to dust 

I will kill you if I must, 

I will help you if I can. 

When it all comes down to dust 

I will help you if I must, 

I will kill you if I can. 

And mercy on our uniform, 

man of peace or man of war, 

the peacock spreads his fan.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y36zbbuX7w[:]

Posted on 4 Comments

[:en]The First Law of Ideas (Reconsidered)[:]

[:en] 

 

Much have I talked about the Great War of Ideas and its importance in our lives.

 

And several times have I spoken or written about the First Law of Ideas [ –  that ANY idea can be wrong] … and how that law ‘falls out’ of an understanding of the Essential Nature of Ideas ( –  namely – that all Ideas and perceptions are, in effect, already wrong … since they are a MODEL of what they are an idea [or perception] OF; and they are useful to us – due to the RESEMBLANCE they bear to their referent.)

 

But

For the past few weeks I’ve undertaken the task of explaining our Mr. Trump’s relationship with the Truth … and I’m no longer satisfied to call (the above described) Law …  ‘The First Law’.

(I mean – I still think it’s TRUE … but I’m no longer willing to say that it’s “first”)  There is (I have come to realize) something more essential and fundamental governing our thinking.

 

[When we talk about the “Laws” of Physics … or the “Laws” of Nature … we are NOT (of course) talking about some form of Legality (such as Tax Law, Immigration Law, or Divorce Law).  We talk about the ‘Law’ of Gravity (for example) – as a way of regarding the everywhere-ness (and reliability) of (any) Natural Law.  It’s our (perhaps quaint) way of describing the fundamental NATURE of a phenomenon.  Mmm?]

 

Our first big High-Dollar job – as a Philosopher – is one we do in the middle of our first year of life:  we POSTULATE the EXISTENCE of The WORLD! (Piaget, of course, explains this transition by our ‘learning to ascribe the property of object permanence’ to things; but I think this denigrates the outrageousness, the magnificence, and the audacity of our postulation.  It’s Big!) And on the BASIS of it … we (gradually) walk away from our Infancy. We begin then to function as a PARTICIPANT in the Events of the World.

 

It’s the Great Transition (demarcating the end of Infancy and the beginning of Childhood)  Even as an infant, we were “conscious”; but we did not know what we were conscious OF. But (eventually) we GET it:  It’s THE WORLD!

 

Before we were having an experience (eyes open) of our surroundings.  We were having a (high fidelity) ‘dream’ of our surroundings … but we still lacked the Initial Cognition (of ‘Reality’ … or ‘The World’) … so our experience was JUST a DREAM.  But – once we dared to Imagine the WORLD … all of a sudden – the World became visible to us and we could begin to (actually) participate in it.

 

The difference between an Infant … and a Child … it’s a HUGE difference.   And we ALL DID IT.

 

And the fact that this landed us smack into Ignorance Consciousness (the naive realism of the Waking State, wherein we think that we (actually) see the World ) is (usually) not of Primary Importance.

I mean – it’s important … but nobody complains about the fact that mortar keeps the bricks apartThe reason we USE mortar (and what’s good about it) is that it CONNECTS the bricks!

 

Right now I’m inclined to think that the (actual) First Law (of Thought) is this image … the Understanding ITSELF – (of our Basic Situation) … a sort of schematic of the Basic Human Situation.  I see it as : Three Zones –

The first zone (the ‘near’ one) is the zone of the (abstract) Self … the experiencer … our Consciousness.

The second zone is inhabited by our thoughts and our perceptions.  This is the Zone of Philosophy.

The third zone is “Reality”, symbolized by “The World”.  (and I say ‘symbolized’ … because there is more to reality than the physical.  Also – we each have a physical body – which is part of the world … which is why I do not say that the First Zone is inhabited by our Ego – which would include the physical body.  Better to regard it simply as the Experiencer (abstract).

So – you see – that we are connected to reality BY our thoughts and perceptions (by our Philosophy) … in much the same way that the bricks in a structure are connected to the foundation by mortar … even though the mortar also separates.

 

I think that what falls out of this image – is the realization that to understand the World … well, it’s a Big Job … it’s quite a challenge!    Thus – The Truth is understood to be a Precious Commodity.

 

And, even though we all started out (from the age of half a year) thinking that we’re in Direct Contact with Reality … as we mature we are able to make increasingly better allowance for other people’s points of view.  We learn that the other person may be right … that there’s nothing ‘special’ (or privileged) about our own point of view.  We become more respectful. And we achieve this even without understanding the nature of the (great) illusion [that we are in direct contact with Reality … that we (actually) see the world … that our sight goes out from our eye]

 

But sometimes

We go the other way.  We might be (entirely) taken in by the Great Projection … the Great Illusion … the sense that WHAT we are seeing is ACTUALLY REALITY.

When THIS happens, it creates a (major) rearrangement in our comprehension of our Basic Situation.  And we no longer have access to the First Law. (we have REPLACED it) The Truth seems to disappear … and so there is NO WAY to pursue it (or respect it, or value it … or wonder whether we are in possession of it … ANY of it.  It’s just GONE.

 

Once you’ve convinced yourself that if you think something … if you believe it – then IT’S TRUE.  If you stay on this path (whether you’re a Human Being … or a Primary Lanonandek Son, such as Lucifer, our one-time System Sovereign) … you’re in Big Trouble.  You’re flirting with Cosmic Insanity.  

And return may not be possible.

 

In the book – “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President”   the authors are able (through knowledge, experience, & training) to evaluate a person WITHOUT projecting their own ways of functioning onto the subject.  The are quite familiar with Projection. But MOST of us … we could Very Easily look at our Mr. Trump … and ascribe to him what OUR motives would have been if WE had done what he (just) did.

 

And I do not consider that Cosmic Insanity is widely understood, nor is it easy to understand.

 

But the First Law bears heavily on it:  that ‘our relationship with the Truth … is Primary.

 

 

And as a culture – our relationship with the Truth … we are painting these days (for the whole world to see) … and with Bold Strokes.

 

Tomorrow I’m pretty sure that our Senate (the Senate of the United States !) will acquit their guy (Donald Trump).  (The Majority)- remembering that they are Republicans … and forgetting that they are the Senate.

 

And the Truth?   Also forgotten.   [as Don McLean sings – “And the three men I admired most – the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost … caught the last train for the coast … the day the Music died.”]

 

And our Republican Senators (who are able to forget they are Senators) also bring to my mind the story of Jumping Mouse … who, having traveled very far, across the great prairie, to the foot of the Sacred Mountain … met a wolf.  And this wolf had a problem – he would forget that he was a wolf.

It’s a good story.  We should all read it … especially our “senators”.      [info at end of essay]

 

Today (of course) was the State of the Union Address.  And for those who would appreciate a description of the actual state of our union, I offer this (reprint)  from TruthOut’s Sasha Abramsky –

The Senate appears poised to acquit President Trump at his impeachment trial, and to essentially greenlight any and all presidential actions as being literally above the law and outside congressional restraining powers. What would an honest third-party observer say if they were invited to give the State of the Union on February 4 in lieu of Donald Trump?

As we approach the 2020 election, it’s time to give an honest accounting of Donald J. Trump’s time in office.

Let’s start with the bottom line: dollars and cents. On the surface, the economy is humming along — based in large part on mechanisms put in place during the Obama administration, as well as this administration’s relentless focus on the short term — though the escalating global coronavirus outbreak could easily cause economic mayhem over the coming months.

The decent economic indicators of the past few years, however, hide deep, systemic problems. The Trump administration summarily discounts all the future harm caused by deregulating workplace safety; undermining environmental rules; opening up public lands to the fossil fuel industry; turbocharging inequality through tax cuts skewed to the rich and cuts to public services used by the poor; eviscerating our public rainy day funds by running historically unprecedented deficits during boom times, thus leaving nothing in reserve for smoothing out the rough edges during the next recession; and pushing to eviscerate the Affordable Care Act, (ACA) to further reduce spending on the safety net, leaving a million more people without insurance in 2019 than in 2018, and creating the possibility that, at Trump’s urging, the U.S. Supreme Court will, soon after the election, strike down the entire ACA edifice.

Unemployment stands at 3.5 percent and median income is on the rise (although, notably, the gulf between rich and poor continues to grow, and the “recovery” has disproportionately benefitted the rich). Some of the ongoing growth is the legacy of Obama’s careful stewardship of the economy in the post-recession years. Partly it is also due to the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates historically low. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, except in part it’s the consequence of Trump bludgeoning the Fed’s chair, Jerome Powell, to keep those interest rates low, at least through the November election, no matter the long-term cost. Low interest rates during boom times — priming an already primed pump — turbocharges investment and borrowing but can stack up a host of inflation-related problems down the road. The long term, however, as repeatedly demonstrated by Trump’s malign business practices before he became president, has always been viewed by The Donald as being for losers. In Trump’s mental universe, only the now matters — only the instant gratification. Only the consumption, the grabbing of whatever is near enough to grab.

But truth be told, it’s not the economy that seems to get Trump’s juices flowing. And, in all fairness, why should he be excited by good economic indicators when a majority of the public doesn’t buy the argument that the good data is enough to qualify him for re-election? In normal years, if a president were presiding over an economic boom like this, that president’s popularity would be stratospheric. But Trump’s isn’t; instead, his support hovers at somewhere between 38 and 44 percent.

No, what gets Trump excited is the fact that his base loves him – and always will. To a depressingly large degree, his 2016 prognostication — when he infamously said he could shoot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue and those guys would stick with him — has been proven right. Yet his supporters have been outnumbered by people who have hated him and his administration from day one. In fact, Adam Schiff’s legally compelling presentations at the Senate impeachment trial have resulted in majorities of Americans now saying he ought to be removed from public office. He won’t be, we all know that; but that has nothing to do with his guilt or innocence over the Ukraine quid pro quo. It has much more to do with the GOP’s willingness to be complicit in his myriad crimes. His attorney, Alan Dershowitz, has advanced the breathtaking argument, apparently now bought into by the vast majority of GOP senators, that anything Trump does to advance his personal interests as president can be conceived as being in the public interest. L’etat c’est moi, as the French kings used to say — not that Trump, in his tasteless MAGA cap, can or wants to speak a foreign language.

Trump’s as guilty as sin on the Ukrainian “drug deal,” but Mitch McConnell’s happy to keep him along for the ride, to cater to his vastly inflated ego, so long as he keeps delivering up fanatically conservative judicial nominees whom the Senate can then process onto the benches at factory-line speed to eviscerate voting rights, undermine anti-poverty programs, attack immigrants and, of course, shred a person’s right to reproductive choice. And even if Mitch-the-Machiavellian weren’t enjoying how much raw power Trump’s handed him, the GOP in Congress is now so scared of the president’s cultist base — and The Donald’s ability to use Twitter to instantly turn mobs against whoever opposes him — that most GOP senators probably wouldn’t convict the president even if he sexually assaulted someone on camera (as opposed to just boasting about it on a hot mic).

Throughout his life Trump has been dogged by allegations of violence, including bullying while at school, sexual assault charges as an adult, and the hectoring and intimidating of employees. These days, what he seems to really enjoy as he sits at the apex of power is the utter debasement of one public institution after the next, the bending of regulatory agencies, and the manipulation of the other branches of government to his personal will. There’s something deeply Nietzschean about it; Trump views himself as the Übermensch, the superman above of and outside of all normal moral limits. Despite the fact that he almost never smiles, Trump seems to genuinely revel in the fact that he has the power to get Bill Barr’s Justice Department to investigate his political opponents, to get the Pentagon to reinstate convicted war criminals, to get the Environmental Protection Agency to rewrite climate change science and the national weather service to support his lies about the path a hurricane might take.

More than three years into his presidency, Trump is glorying in the corrosion and degradation of public discourse; in the establishment of what a few smart alecks back in 2017 and 2018 were calling a “Kakistocracy,” a realm where the shit rises to the top, where the crudest, cruelest people are amply rewarded for their service, and where humane world visions are replaced by loyalty, fealty, devotion to the Dear Leader, the man with, as he so piquantly put it, “great and unmatched wisdom.”

Trump is clearly enjoying the implosion of empathy and human rights, seen most prominently in how the country and its bureaucracies now treat immigrants: caging children; enforcing mandatory DNA and pregnancy tests; bottling would-be asylum seekers up in fetid, disease-riddled, violent camps; sending asylum seekers from Guatemala to Honduras, and from Honduras to El Salvador. The president appears to be having fun seeing immigration attorneys in fits of horror at new public charge rules that essentially impose wealth tests on those seeking to make the U.S. their home. He seems to be at his happiest when flirting with the idea of dramatically expanding the Muslim travel ban — now that the Supreme Court has given him carte blanche on that front — or proposing new ways to lock down the southern border.

The scale of this political tragedy is vast. Every time Trump journeys to a conference or a summit or a meeting of allies overseas, he ends up pissing off yet another leader from yet another country that we have enjoyed close ties to for the better part of a century. He has asserted his unilateral authority to assassinate foreign officials he doesn’t like — and to threaten to obliterate their countries’ cultural and population centers if they dare to respond. He has scrapped the INF nuclear arms control treaty, and threatens to withdraw from the treaties limiting intercontinental ballistic missiles, increasing the likelihood of an atomic Armageddon. Now the world stands on the precipice of what the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists calls “midnight,” that moment when nuclear proliferation ceases to be controllable.

Trump’s nuclear recklessness is matched only by his appalling disregard for the environment and for the perils of climate change. He is doing everything in his power not just to roll back Obama-era environmental rules aimed at tackling climate change, but also to actively push policies that would further increase CO2 in the atmosphere rapidly. He is even ending California’s authority to regulate tailpipe emissions, even though many of the world’s biggest car manufacturers had agreed to design more fuel-efficient, less-polluting cars that would meet those standards.

Internationally, in embracing Brexit and its aims, Trump and his nationalist team have managed to undermine the coherence of the European Union and put the post-war stability of Europe at risk. On a near daily basis, for reasons that often seem as random as whether Trump woke up on the right or wrong side of the bed that morning, he throws wrenches into the works of international trade systems and partnerships. His negotiators work on trade agreements with other countries only for Trump to arbitrarily threaten to impose tariffs on erstwhile partners. And as the U.S.’s commitment to these relationships fades, trade spats around the globe, including between allies like South Korea and Japan, are escalating.

Because of McConnell’s Faustian bargain, overseas governments and criminal enterprises will implicitly be given free rein to interfere in U.S. elections as much and as often as the president demands it.

Domestically, white supremacist violence is on the rise across the U.S., and neo-Nazi groups such as The Base and Atomwaffen are on the march — openly participating in gun-pride events and using the internet to threaten race war. For these groups, Trump is a talisman, a symbol of how their worldview can triumph.

But, while Trump flirts with white nationalism, he’s also, primarily, concerned with numero uno. He self-deals shamelessly, channeling business to his hotel in D.C., to his golf courses and resorts in Florida, to his overseas properties in Scotland, in Turkey and elsewhere.

He loves the Saudi government’s leadership. Since Saudi Arabia buys huge amounts of American weaponry, Trump forgives its government for its involvement in the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. He wants to do more business with Turkey and thus doesn’t think twice about giving Turkey free-range to attack and kill the Kurds in Syria. He feels simpatico with the strong-man leadership style of China’s President Xi, and thus refuses to say more than a few milquetoast words in support of Hong Kong’s democracy protesters.

Three years in, Trump increasingly views himself as all-powerful. He has articulated a political doctrine that Article II of the Constitution allows him as president to do “whatever I want,” and he has sent his lawyers to court to argue that he is literally unindictable, that he is definitionally above the law. The Senate will, in its acceptance of Dershowitz’s arguments, give its imprimatur to this. Seeking to leverage their short-term power, McConnell and the rest of his gang will weaken the long-term ability of Congress to function as a co-equal branch of government, thus signing off on Congress’s own demise, in much the same way as Roman senators, in the dying days of the Republic, divided into a series of warring factions and ceded power to strongmen and dictators, thus paving the way for imperial rule.

From here on in, because of McConnell’s Faustian bargain, overseas governments and criminal enterprises will implicitly be given free rein to interfere in U.S. elections as much and as often as the president demands it. They will be vultures pecking at the corpse of U.S. democracy.

Trump is like Charlie Chaplin’s tyrant-character in The Great Dictator, dreamily playing with an inflated world globe. He jokes about ruling for life, but, drunk on his own power, he no longer knows where humor ends and longing begins. His entire presidency is a Rorschach test. And each day he remains in office speaks volumes to the real state of the union — and to where it is heading.

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  [for our Senators] :

How many legs does a dog have

if you count the tail as a leg?

Four.

Calling the tail a leg

does not make it a leg.

                –   Abraham Lincoln

 

 

Lincoln also said –  “I have learned that most men can withstand adversity.  If you would test a man’s character, give him power.”

 

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President”   – by Bandy X. Lee , Jeffrey Sachs, et al.

 

The story of Jumping Mouse is from –  “Seven Arrows”   by Hyemeyohsts Storm 

 [:]

Posted on 9 Comments

[:en]Relativity[:]

[:en] 

Because the regime is captive to its own lies, it must falsify everything. It falsifies the past. It falsifies the present, and it falsifies the future. It falsifies statistics. It pretends not to possess an omnipotent and unprincipled police apparatus. It pretends to respect human rights. It pretends to prosecute no one. It pretends to fear nothing. It pretends to pretend nothing

                                                                                                 –  Vaclav Havel

 

 

 

 

 

As always, the Great War of Ideas continues to rage – (both around us and in us.)

 

Last week the essay was about our president’s impeachment.  This week I would like (if I am able to do so) to say some things to contextualize our understanding of our relationship with the Truth … (particularly in regard to our Mr. Trump’s ‘love affair’ with the Truth)

 

Last week I made use of an interview of Bill Moyers  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CAOY08k2ao )     wherein he said that President Trump is a “solipsist”.  I think this is actually a very helpful comment. (I’m assuming now – that our ‘shared goal’  is to better understand what’s happening)

[And, in case you want to make use of it, I’ll include at the end of this essay – the link to the Wikipedia page on ‘Solipsism’]

 

But I feel that it is inadequate (simply) to name the condition (‘He’s a solipsist’)  I’m hoping we can understand it a bit deeper.

 

M. Scott Peck wrote a book called “The People of the Lie”.  Here’s a brief summary –

 

 

 

Also

 

I would like to acquaint you with (the basics of) ‘Relativity’ (as I learned something about it during my 17 years in a religious order)

 

‘Intellectual Relativism’ believes that “All truth is relative” … that one belief is as good as another … and that (finally) there IS no TRUTH.  It’s just ‘my word against yours’ … and that’s all there is to it. It essentially DENIES the existence of Absolutes (of Absolute Truth). And (of course) it puts an end to all discussion before it even begins.

 

‘Moral Relativism’ takes the position – that  there IS NO right or wrong.  (And – there is No evil.)  Ever hear the expression – “It’s all Good”?  (Quite a bit of New Age thought comes from Relativity … and deserves to be reconsidered)

 

But now I should warn you – that the next couple references contain mention of numerous (non-human) orders of beings.  (this does not trouble me, but it may trouble you) –

 

[If you’d like to make use of it – “The Cosmic Family  Volume I” offers a pretty good summary, beginning on pp.23 & 24  – ‘The Fall of our System Sovereign and Planetary Prince’          { availability:  at end of essay } ]

 

In The Urantia Book there is considerable information in Papers 53 & 54 (‘The Lucifer Rebellion’  and ‘Problems of the Lucifer Rebellion’)     Here are a couple excerpts –

 

2. The Causes of Rebellion

53:2.1 (602.4) Lucifer and his first assistant, Satan, had reigned on Jerusem for more than five hundred thousand years when in their hearts they began to array themselves against the Universal Father and his then vicegerent Son, Michael.

53:2.2 (602.5) There were no peculiar or special conditions in the system of Satania which suggested or favored rebellion. It is our belief that the idea took origin and form in Lucifer’s mind, and that he might have instigated such a rebellion no matter where he might have been stationed. Lucifer first announced his plans to Satan, but it required several months to corrupt the mind of his able and brilliant associate. However, when once converted to the rebel theories, he became a bold and earnest advocate of “self-assertion and liberty.”

53:2.3 (602.6) No one ever suggested rebellion to Lucifer. The idea of self-assertion in opposition to the will of Michael and to the plans of the Universal Father, as they are represented in Michael, had its origin in his own mind. His relations with the Creator Son had been intimate and always cordial. At no time prior to the exaltation of his own mind did Lucifer openly express dissatisfaction about the universe administration. Notwithstanding his silence, for more than one hundred years of standard time the Union of Days on Salvington had been reflectivating to Uversa that all was not at peace in Lucifer’s mind. This information was also communicated to the Creator Son and the Constellation Fathers of Norlatiadek.

53:2.4 (602.7) Throughout this period Lucifer became increasingly critical of the entire plan of universe administration but always professed wholehearted loyalty to the Supreme Rulers. His first outspoken disloyalty was manifested on the occasion of a visit of Gabriel to Jerusem just a few days before the open proclamation of the Lucifer Declaration of Liberty. Gabriel was so profoundly impressed with the certainty of the impending outbreak that he went direct to Edentia to confer with the Constellation Fathers regarding the measures to be employed in case of open rebellion.

53:2.5 (603.1) It is very difficult to point out the exact cause or causes which finally culminated in the Lucifer rebellion. We are certain of only one thing, and that is: Whatever these first beginnings were, they had their origin in Lucifer’s mind. There must have been a pride of self that nourished itself to the point of self-deception, so that Lucifer for a time really persuaded himself that his contemplation of rebellion was actually for the good of the system, if not of the universe. By the time his plans had developed to the point of disillusionment, no doubt he had gone too far for his original and mischief-making pride to permit him to stop. At some point in this experience he became insincere, and evil evolved into deliberate and willful sin. That this happened is proved by the subsequent conduct of this brilliant executive. He was long offered opportunity for repentance, but only some of his subordinates ever accepted the proffered mercy. The Faithful of Days of Edentia, on the request of the Constellation Fathers, in person presented the plan of Michael for the saving of these flagrant rebels, but always was the mercy of the Creator Son rejected and rejected with increasing contempt and disdain.

~~~~~~~~~~~

53:5.6 (606.2) “There was war in heaven; Michael’s commander and his angels fought against the dragon (Lucifer, Satan, and the apostate princes); and the dragon and his rebellious angels fought but prevailed not.” This “war in heaven” was not a physical battle as such a conflict might be conceived on Urantia. In the early days of the struggle Lucifer held forth continuously in the planetary amphitheater. Gabriel conducted an unceasing exposure of the rebel sophistries from his headquarters taken up near at hand. The various personalities present on the sphere who were in doubt as to their attitude would journey back and forth between these discussions until they arrived at a final decision.

53:5.7 (606.3) But this war in heaven was very terrible and very real. While displaying none of the barbarities so characteristic of physical warfare on the immature worlds, this conflict was far more deadly; material life is in jeopardy in material combat, but the war in heaven was fought in terms of life eternal.

 

[Though it says (in 53:5.6) that – ‘ the dragon and his rebellious angels fought but prevailed not.’ … I once heard the Bright and Morning Star of Salvington (- Gabriel, who argued for God  and against the rebellion) say … that, when at last this great debate ended … he thought he had lost.]

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

 

I believe that the ‘correct’ way to understand ANY person … is to keep in mind – that whatever that person did … we are ALL capable of it.

 

George Will wrote – “Trump is what he is, a floundering, inarticulate jumble of gnawing insecurities and not-at-all compensating vanities, which is pathetic,” Will stated at the end of his column. “Pence is what he has chosen to be, which is horrifying.”

 

Now, I like George Will very much, and I respect and value him; but I think he is wrong to think that Donald Trump (simply) IS what he IS.  

 

Having done some studying (and thinking) about Lucifer’s downfall, I feel confident that Trump (also) made a choice.  He CHOSE to scorn the Truth … to prefer his own beliefs … or (perhaps) to think that his beliefs (simply) ARE the truth.

 

I suspect that such a choice … amounts to a denial of Reality.

 

What we mean by ‘Reality’ is that – it does NOT depend upon us (our beliefs or awareness).  I think my house is real. By that – I mean that even when no person is in the house … or if I forget about the house … that the house STILL EXISTS.  That its existence is INDEPENDENT from me (or my awareness of it).

 

I think Trump must have made a choice to ‘reclassify reality’, as it were.  I suspect that he no longer regards it as having an independent existence (from him).

I’m pretty sure that Lucifer made a similar choice.

But – what’s going to happen, do you think, when a person is no longer able to distinguish between REALITY … and WHAT THEY BELIEVE IS TRUE?

Well … it’s going to be a real mess!

And this is probably why such a condition is regarded (among the celestials) as COSMIC INSANITY.

 

This is NOT an easy thing to understand … yet we should apply ourselves  … help each other. We should TRY.

 

I recommend you watch 

 

 

Ms. Warren talks about how we ALL are involved (every day, in many ways) in self-deception.

 

But – our Mr.Trump has taken self-deception to such an extreme … that it’s scary.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism

 

 

https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-53-lucifer-rebellion?term=%2253%22#U53_0_0

 

 

The Cosmic Family, Vol. I    is available from  –

https://globalchangetools.org/

                    or through Amazon

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

How many legs does a dog have

if you count the tail as a leg?

Four.

Calling the tail a leg

does not make it a leg.

 

                –   Abraham Lincoln

 

 [:]

Posted on 134 Comments

[:en]Impeach?[:]

[:en] 

How many legs does a dog have

if you count the tail as a leg?

Four.

Calling the tail a leg

does not make it a leg.

 

                                  –   Abraham Lincoln

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will our (Republican dominated) senate muster up the necessary tunnel vision (ignoring the facts, ignoring their oath) to acquit our Mr. Trump of his betrayal of the public trust?  

It looks like it.

Is not such Tunnel Vision really a form of arrogance?  [thinking that we’re so important that we are at liberty to ignore whatever does not pertain to Republican Party politics.  (Who cares about Context?  Who cares about the nature of the Broader Situation?)  As though we were our own Primary Reality!]

 

But suppose they don’t.  Suppose for a minute they find him guilty (of the crimes indicated by the facts)

Do you imagine that Donald Trump will admit that he did wrong?   Mmm?

 

NOT A CHANCE !

 

Donald Trump is Our Problem.  He’s US, really. He’s the Arrival our society has been heading toward for quite some time.

 

And … WHICH do you think is more important?  President Trump being on trial? …. or the fact that our Entire Society is on Trial before the World?

 

WHAT is our relationship with the Truth?   (and how has that relationship been developing during the last couple centuries?)

 

We treat Knowledge as though it were a disease.  In our public schools, we teach our children that if they can just pass (a certain) test … they will then be “immune” to the knowledge covered in the test … and they won’t have to bother with it further.  (Once you’ve had the measles, you won’t have to deal with it again. You’ll then be immune.)

 

And – what about the “sport” of Debate?  We’ve been doing (formalized) debate since 1892   (a century and a quarter)   

     

What do these competitions tell us about our society’s relationship with the Truth?

(quite a bit, I think) –

 

Does a formal (inter-collegiate) debate (or the preparation for it) even vaguely resemble a truth-seekers’ Think-Tank?  (A cooperative striving to come closer to the truth.  An earnest attempt to understand some particularly elusive aspect of reality)?

 

No.

 

It’s all about persuasion. 

The Reality (of the real World) … the Truth of the matter … such considerations have long ago faded into the mist … somewhere now over the horizon, perhaps hidden by the (modern-cognitive) curve of the earth.

 

Instead … it’s Salesmanship.

 

We have traded in Reality (and the Truth) … for MARKETING.

 

And so we have (through long labor) produced a man with a heightened sense of How he Looks / of Appearance … and NO sense of the Truth.  (and we have made him our PRESIDENT)

 

And now (as we struggle over whether to relieve him of his position) we display – for all the world to see … just HOW FAR (from the Truth) … we have come.

 

(Such an achievement!)

 

 

Impeach the President?        It’s WE who are on trial.

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[Please take note of Bill Moyers’ comments about Václav Havel, near the end of his talk.]

 

 

 (Noam Chomsky –

The Most Dangerous Organization in Human History)

**************************

 (Bill Moyers – on The Dangers Of So Much Dishonesty)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CAOY08k2ao[:]

Posted on 2 Comments

[:en]Too Little[:]

[:en] 

It is one of the commonest of mistakes to consider that the limits of our power of perception is also the limit of all there is to perceive.

                                                                                                                     –    C. W. Leadbeater

 

 

 

 

We are highly (highly) resistant to believing in things we have not directly experienced.

 

We all know what a unicorn is.  But (I think) very few people believe they are real … (me too). 

But, did you know – that, even as late as 1900, very few people believed that gorillas were real (despite the fact that they knew about them … they knew what they were)  People did not believe in gorillas TILL THEY WERE CAPTURED AND PRESENTED, IN PERSON (as it were).

 

We tend to make direct experience into a requirement (for belief).

 

But, I think there’s more to it than that …  (that is – more to why our resistance to belief is so strong)

 

Maybe watch this video, wherein a medical doctor (and skeptic, Justin Coleman) fails to be convinced that actual healing is taking place … EVEN THOUGH he is a direct witness to the ‘healings’.  And I think it’s because he is fond of his belief structure (which [he believes] he himself created) … and is unable to make sense of what he sees – IN TERMS OF that STRUCTURE. And so … he REMAINS A SKEPTIC.

 

 

 

I think, too – that a good portion of our resistance to belief comes from the fact that it seems to us that our “sight” goes out from our eyes … and strikes (and apprehends) our environment … out there, where the things are.  This (all day, every day) experience … leaves us (STUCK with) the impression … that we “SEE THE WORLD” … that we are in direct contact with reality !  (which we are NOT) 

Most of us (actually DO) realize – that the direction of perception is INward.  … But, since we EXPERIENCE it as outward … we operate under the illusion that … we are in DIRECT CONTACT with reality.          (I have discussed this [powerful and persistent] illusion in previous essays)

Anyway, I quite suspect – that this same illusion is partly responsible for the fact that we have such (great) resistance … to believing in anything which we have not (personally and) directly experienced.

 

But in any case …  it’s still a mistake.  (a malfunction)

 

 

There may be quite a number of things that I believe in (believe to be real) … which you may not.

 

But, let’s just consider a couple :  angels … and crop circles.

 

The MAIN reason I believe in angels – is because I am able to respect the (personal, reported) direct experience OF OTHERS.

I do not own all the experience in the world.  Should we not respect the experience of others?  (and make use of it?)

 

 

 

 

or

 

 

 

or

 

7. The Talk About Angels

167:7.1 (1840.6) As they journeyed up the hills from Jericho to Bethany, Nathaniel walked most of the way by the side of Jesus, and their discussion of children in relation to the kingdom of heaven led indirectly to the consideration of the ministry of angels. Nathaniel finally asked the Master this question: “Seeing that the high priest is a Sadducee, and since the Sadducees do not believe in angels, what shall we teach the people regarding the heavenly ministers?” Then, among other things, Jesus said:

167:7.2 (1841.1) “The angelic hosts are a separate order of created beings; they are entirely different from the material order of mortal creatures, and they function as a distinct group of universe intelligences. Angels are not of that group of creatures called ‘the Sons of God’ in the Scriptures; neither are they the glorified spirits of mortal men who have gone on to progress through the mansions on high. Angels are a direct creation, and they do not reproduce themselves. The angelic hosts have only a spiritual kinship with the human race. As man progresses in the journey to the Father in Paradise, he does traverse a state of being at one time analogous to the state of the angels, but mortal man never becomes an angel.

167:7.3 (1841.2) “The angels never die, as man does. The angels are immortal unless, perchance, they become involved in sin as did some of them with the deceptions of Lucifer. The angels are the spirit servants in heaven, and they are neither all-wise nor all-powerful. But all of the loyal angels are truly pure and holy.

167:7.4 (1841.3) “And do you not remember that I said to you once before that, if you had your spiritual eyes anointed, you would then see the heavens opened and behold the angels of God ascending and descending? It is by the ministry of the angels that one world may be kept in touch with other worlds, for have I not repeatedly told you that I have other sheep not of this fold? And these angels are not the spies of the spirit world who watch upon you and then go forth to tell the Father the thoughts of your heart and to report on the deeds of the flesh. The Father has no need of such service inasmuch as his own spirit lives within you. But these angelic spirits do function to keep one part of the heavenly creation informed concerning the doings of other and remote parts of the universe. And many of the angels, while functioning in the government of the Father and the universes of the Sons, are assigned to the service of the human races. When I taught you that many of these seraphim are ministering spirits, I spoke not in figurative language nor in poetic strains. And all this is true, regardless of your difficulty in comprehending such matters.

167:7.5 (1841.4) “Many of these angels are engaged in the work of saving men, for have I not told you of the seraphic joy when one soul elects to forsake sin and begin the search for God? I did even tell you of the joy in the presence of the angels of heaven over one sinner who repents, thereby indicating the existence of other and higher orders of celestial beings who are likewise concerned in the spiritual welfare and with the divine progress of mortal man.

167:7.6 (1841.5) “Also are these angels very much concerned with the means whereby man’s spirit is released from the tabernacles of the flesh and his soul escorted to the mansions in heaven. Angels are the sure and heavenly guides of the soul of man during that uncharted and indefinite period of time which intervenes between the death of the flesh and the new life in the spirit abodes.”

167:7.7 (1841.6) And he would have spoken further with Nathaniel regarding the ministry of angels, but he was interrupted by the approach of Martha, who had been informed that the Master was drawing near to Bethany by friends who had observed him ascending the hills to the east. And she now hastened to greet him.

 

The reason, by the way, that Jesus told Nathaniel (in the 1st paragraph of p. 1841 of the Urantia Book) that humans do not become angels when we die … is because – that was a common belief in those days (just as it still is today).

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

 

Let us consider the phenomenon of Crop Circles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Though I have never (personally) seen a crop circle … even so, I feel they are real … and (often) exquisitely beautiful.  Nor do I doubt – that they are created for us (humans) as a form of communication … from some (higher, and benevolent) race (or races) of beings.  I believe they care about us … and hope for our survival. I’m sure they are aware of the considerable hazards (of self-destruction) which confront us; and I think they are pulling for us.

 

And … it has occurred to me – that (maybe) – simply gazing at these wonderful designs (even if we apparently do not ‘understand’ what they mean) … still it may be helping us in some way.  Once we’ve seen such patterns … we’re not quite the same as we were.          Mmm?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOgn9JZm6qI    (balls of light   forming crop circles)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BndVb1ucKOA    (UFO’s making crop circles)

 

 

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

 

I will (yet again) quote William Irwin Thompson :

 

We are like flies crawling across the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel: we cannot see what angels and gods lie underneath the threshold of our perceptions.  We do not live in reality; we live in our paradigms, our habituated perceptions, our illusions; the illusions we share through culture we call reality; but the true historical reality of our condition is invisible to us.

 

 

The world we live in … that is, the world that we imagine that we live in … is very much smaller (and duller) than the one we actually live in.

 

We believe (in) too little.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

film – Heaven Is For Real   (2014   Greg Kinnear  et al.)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSqCe8nYQ4A    (EBENs etc.  – Linda Moulton Howe )[:]

Posted on 8 Comments

[:en]Mercy[:]

[:en] 

 

At the end of your earth life you will all expect mercy;

therefore do I require of you during your mortal life that 

you show mercy to all of your brethren in the flesh.

                                                                  –  Urantia Book, p. 1571.4

 

 

 

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The song –  “Bring Me Little Water, Sylvie”  is attributed to Lead Belly.

 

[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_Belly ]

 

It’s a simple song –

 

 

My (current) suspicion as to why this song is (so) touching … is that – it is about Mercy.

 

I have read that Huddie Bedbetter (Lead Belly) knew how to work hard.  He picked cotton on a prison farm : Lead Man, in the Lead Row, in the highest-producing work-farm in Texas.  I’m pretty sure he knew what it was like to be thirsty … to crave a simple drink of water.

Also (in general) he knew about suffering (and being in Need of Mercy) … as every black person in America has known that.  And their (white) masters have not been famous for their mercy.

 

The poignancy in the request for water … comes from the intensity of the suffering from which the request is made.

 

Blacks were fed a steady diet of brutality and degradation  –

 

 

 

 

Joel Chandler Harris is credited as “author” of (the many) “Uncle Remus” stories; but Harris says – he did not make up one word of them.  He simply wrote them down as he heard them.

And these tales were a part of the black oral tradition (from the times of slavery in America).  There are many characters in these tales (and most of these are ‘animals’); but the two main ones are  – Bre’r Fox and Bre’r Rabbit. The blacks, you see, identified with the rabbit. And they’re the ones who made up these tales. … And the Fox (they all knew) represented their white masters.  Foxes and rabbits have lived in this world for a long time. And, of course, a fox will sometimes eat a rabbit … if he can catch him. But the rabbits are still here … and they survive (largely) by their wits.  So the slaves (made up and) told each other these stories … about how the rabbit would (usually) outwit the fox, and sometimes even make a fool out of him.

They fully realized that they were at a tremendous disadvantage in their (many) interactions with their white masters.  But in the stories, they were at liberty to best their (evil and formidable) adversary … in any way they could imagine. I’m sure it gave them many a laugh.  These tales gave them some relief, and perhaps kept them from complete discouragement and the depths of depression.

They comprise a noteworthy body of literature … and a good many of them are very funny indeed.

 

I would suggest –        The Favorite Uncle Remus

                                       by Joel Chandler Harris and A. B. Frost 

 

 

 

 

When I saw the film “The Sting”  (the scene where Robert Redford is walking alone along the city streets at night … accompanied by certain song (a Scott Joplin piece) – I was astonished that a piece of instrumental music could be (so clearly) compassionate.  Then I found out that the name of that song is …  “Solace” !

So – a song need not (even) have lyrics … to convey the energy of Mercy.

 

 

 

 

But … no doubt the real question is –  WILL WE BE CONVEYORS OF MERCY ?

 

For the purposes of this essay, we should acknowledge that MERCY is (approximately) equivalent to Loving Kindness.  

 

A good example is – the way the Samaritan treated the stranger he came across (who had been robbed, beaten, and left by the wayside) –

“A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell into the hands of cruel brigands, who robbed him, stripped him and beat him, and departing, left him half dead. Very soon, by chance, a certain priest was going down that way, and when he came upon the wounded man, seeing his sorry plight, he passed by on the other side of the road. And in like manner a Levite also, when he came along and saw the man, passed by on the other side. Now, about this time, a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed down to Jericho, came across this wounded man; and when he saw how he had been robbed and beaten, he was moved with compassion, and going over to him, he bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine, and setting the man upon his own beast, brought him here to the inn and took care of him. And on the morrow he took out some money and, giving it to the host, said: ‘Take good care of my friend, and if the expense is more, when I come back again, I will repay you.’ Now let me ask you: Which of these three turned out to be the neighbor of him who fell among the robbers?” And when the lawyer perceived that he had fallen into his own snare, he answered, “He who showed mercy on him.” And Jesus said, “Go and do likewise.”

                                                                                                                                             – UB   p. 1810

 

He had never met him before … yet he treated him like Family   (with mercy, with loving kindness)

 

Are we (ever) going to grow up and learn to treat each other … like Family?

 

Well … our values (to some extent, at least) –  fall out of our beliefs … out of ‘what we think is true’.   Mmm?

 

The fact that we (still) live in a “dog-eat-dog” world … indicates that we (still) believe that this is just ‘how the world is’.

 

However

…one of the things that’s become clear to me (just from watching certain YouTube videos over the last couple years) – is that ANIMALS are (also) loving!

 

[Love is not something that’s peculiar to humans]

Cats + owls … sharks + people … meerkats … whales … dolphins … crows … parrots … octopus … rhinos … alligators … bears … horses … lions … tigers … chimps and gorillas.

 

New videos roll in to YouTube … at the rate of 300 hours (of new video footage) EVERY MINUTE.

 

With so many ‘eyes’ now on the world around us – it’s becoming increasingly difficult to deny – that we LIVE IN A LOVE-INFUSED UNIVERSE.

 

Maybe it’s time we gave up our “It’s a dog-eat-dog world” story (and the selfishness it seems to justify)  … Mmm?

 

As Stephen Hawking says –        The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,

                                                                   it is the illusion of knowledge.

 

People like Simon Sinek (who teach leaders of big companies how to ‘create Family’ within their microculture and why they need to) … find themselves going up the ‘down’ staircase.  

Our current (dominant) management model / world view is (still) Productivity and Profits   over  People and Sustainability.     {Money over Mercy}

 

But I’m sure – this isn’t the best we can do …

 

Compassion is not at all weak.  It is the strength that arises out of seeing the true nature of suffering in the world.  Compassion allows us to bear witness to that suffering, whether it is in ourselves or others, without fear;  it allows us to name injustice without hesitation, and to act strongly, with all the skill at our disposal. To develop this mind state of compassion … is to learn to live, as the Buddha put it, with sympathy for all living beings, without exception.    

                                                                                                   –     Sharon Salzberg

 

It’s up to us.        We can choose … (and we do).

So –

What if a society has the wherewithal to ease the suffering of their most disadvantaged members … but they choose not to?

 

Then what?

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Brer Fox Holds the Horse

African American

 

One day Brer Rabbit was going along the road studying how he was going to hold his own with Brer Fox when he saw a great big horse lying stretched out flat on his side in the pasture. He crept up, he did, to see if this horse had gone and died. He crept up, and he crept around, and by and by he saw the horse switch his tail, and then Brer Rabbit knew he wasn’t dead. With that, Brer Rabbit loped back to the big road, and almost the first man he saw going by was Brer Fox.

Brer Rabbit, he took after him, and hollered, “Brer Fox! O Brer Fox! Come back! I’ve got some good news for you. Come back, Brer Fox,” he said.

Brer Fox, he turned around, he did, and when he saw who was calling him he came galloping back, because it seemed like this was just as good a time as any to nab Brer Rabbit. But before he got within nabbing distance, Brer Rabbit, he up and said, “Come on, Brer Fox! I just found the place where you can lay in fresh meat enough to last you plumb until the middle of next year,” he said.

Brer Fox, he asked where it was, and Brer Rabbit, he said, “Right over there in the pasture,” and Brer Fox asked what it was, and Brer Rabbit said it was a whole horse lying down on the ground where they could catch him and tie him up.

With that, Brer Fox said, “Come on,” and off they went.

When they got there, sure enough, they lay the horse all stretched out in the sun fast asleep, and then Brer Fox and Brer Rabbit had a dispute about how they were going to fix the horse so he could not get loose. One said one way and the other said another way, and so it was until after a while Brer Rabbit said, “The only plan I can think of, Brer Fox, is for you to go down there and let me tie you to the horse’s tail,” he said. “If I were a big man like you are,” said Brer Rabbit, “you could tie me to the horse’s tail, and if I didn’t hold him down, then Joe’s dead and Sal’s a widow. I just know that you can hold him down,” said Brer Rabbit. “But if you are afraid, we had just better drop this idea and study out some other plan,” he said.

Brer Fox was sort of dubious about this, but it pleased him to play biggity in front of Brer Rabbit, and he agreed to the plan. Then Brer Rabbit, he took and tied Brer Fox to the horse’s tail, and after he had him tied there hard and fast, he sort of stepped back, he did, and put his hands akimbo, and grinned, and then he said, “If there ever was a caught horse then it is this one that we caught. It sort of looks like we put the bridle on the wrong end.”

With that Brer Rabbit cut himself a long switch and trimmed it up. When he had it fixed, he stepped up and hit the horse a rap — pow! The horse was so surprised at this that he made one jump and landed on his feet. When he did that, there was Brer Fox dangling in the air.

Brer Rabbit, he darted out of the way and hollered, “Hold him down, Brer Fox! Hold him down! I’ll stand out here and not get in your way. Hold him down, Brer Fox! Hold him down!”

Of course, when the horse felt Brer Fox hanging there on his tail, he thought something was the matter, and this made him jump and rear worse and worse, and he shook up Brer Fox just like he was a rag in the wind, and Brer Rabbit, he jumped and hollered, “Hold him down, Brer Fox! Hold him down! You’ve got him now! Hold your grip, and hold him down!” he said.

The horse, he jumped ,and he jumped, and he ripped, and he reared, and he snorted, and he tore. But Brer Fox kept hanging on, and Brer Rabbit kept skipping around hollering, “Hold him down, Brer Fox! You’ve got him where he can’t get away. Hold him down, Brer Fox!” he said.

By and by, when Brer Fox got the chance, he hollered back, he did, “How in the name of goodness am I going to hold the horse down unless I get my claws in the ground?”

Then Brer Rabbit, he stood back a little further and hollered a little louder, “Hold him down, Brer Fox! Hold him down! You’ve got him now! Hold him down!”

By and by the horse began to kick with his hind legs, and the first thing you know, he fetched Brer Fox a lick in the stomach that fairly made him squall, and then he kicked him again, and this time he broke Brer Fox loose, and sent him a-whirling; and Brer Rabbit, he kept on a-jumping around and hollering, “Hold him down, Brer Fox!”

“Did the fox get killed, Uncle Remus?” asked the little boy.

“He wasn’t exactly killed, honey,” replied the old man, “but he was next door to it. He was all broken up, and while he was getting well, it sort of came across his mind that Brer Rabbit had done and played a trick on him.”

 

~~~~~~~~~~~

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCzFaOoM8ZA[:]

Posted on 1 Comment

[:en]Some Context[:]

[:en] 

If you want to identify me, ask me not where I live, or what I like to eat, or how I comb my hair, but ask me what I am living for, in detail, ask me what I think is keeping me from living fully for the thing I want to live for.  Between these two answers you can determine the identity of any person. The better the answer he has, the more of a person he is.

                                                                               –  Thomas Merton  

 

 

 

Archaic Torso of Apollo

 

We have no idea what his fantastic head

was like, where the eyeballs were slowly swelling.  But

his body now is glowing like a lamp

whose inner eyes, only turned down a little,

hold their flame, shine.  If there weren’t light, the curve

of the breast wouldn’t blind you, and in the swerve

if the thighs a smile wouldn’t keep on going

towards the place where the seeds are.

If there weren’t light, this stone would look cut off

where it drops so clearly from the shoulders,

its skin wouldn’t gleam like the fur of a wild animal,

and the body wouldn’t send out light from every edge

as a star does … for there is no place at all

that isn’t looking at you.  You must change your life.

                                             –   Rainer Maria Rilke  

                                                                       (transl: Robert Bly) 

 

 

 

Burning the Old Year

 

Letters swallow themselves in seconds.   

Notes friends tied to the doorknob,   

transparent scarlet paper,

sizzle like moth wings,

marry the air.

So much of any year is flammable,   

lists of vegetables, partial poems.   

Orange swirling flame of days,   

so little is a stone.

Where there was something and suddenly isn’t,   

an absence shouts, celebrates, leaves a space.   

I begin again with the smallest numbers.

Quick dance, shuffle of losses and leaves,   

only the things I didn’t do   

crackle after the blazing dies.

                          

                                                        –    Naomi Shihab Nye                 

 

 

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

We live on a planet where the chief life form is genuinely confused as to whether his grandfather was God … or a monkey.    

                                                                                                                                        – Archy [the cockroach] / Don Marquis

 

 

We know that we are killing the planet we live on, but we have not yet made up our mind to stop.

 

 

We could choose to survive.

 

 

From most points of view, THIS is another planet.

 

 

 

The Great War of Ideas continues to rage   all around us … and IN us.   (We are ALL participants)

 

 

There are planners … and there are plannees.             – Ursula Franklin

 

The Super Rich     are NOT our friends.   They keep us from living in a state of (universal) affluence.   They have undermined our education system and reshaped our society to suite their (own, sleezy) purposes.   (Our hope in defeating them lies in  educating ourselves … coming to understand them and our situation   BETTER than they understand us.)        [please see the Chris Hedges video at the end of this essay]

 

 

Everyone has 24 hours (every day)  – in which to do the things that are the most important.

 

 

We do not know who we are.   We are (as William Irwin Thompson says)   ‘like flies crawling around on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.’           The greatest miracles are invisibly close.

 

We are multi-dimensional beings living in a multidimensional universe.  (our experience ranges from Selfless Love … to diarrhea)

 

‘You are not a human being having a spiritual experience, you are a spirit being having a human experience.’

 

Despite the fact that most people BELIEVE that happiness comes from the outside … it is not so.   Our happiness comes from WITHIN us.   We need to learn to take responsibility for our own feelings (and not blame others).

 

We are always training SOMETHING.   I need to adjust my habits & daily routine   to align with and support my goals & aspirations.

 

Our failures and our achievements are less important than our aspirations and habits.                

  [ref; https://worldfamilytrading.com/our-tetrahedron/  ]     

 

 

In the affairs of men’s hearts the Universal Father may not always have his way; but in the conduct and destiny of a planet the divine plan prevails. …”                –   The Urantia Book,  p. 51

 

Nature bats last.

 

 

We COULD adopt laws which prohibit destruction of the planet.

 

 

       [Please do not fail to watch this following video.  It’s true. It’s relevant. And it’s less than five minutes long.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQz5vjt_HYI     (Change Your Life)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The Only New Year’s Resolution I Ever Make

A new year means New Year’s resolutions for many people. I want to share with you the only New Year’s resolution I ever make.  This one New Year’s resolution is all encompassing – it will take care of all your other resolutions in one go, whether that’s to find love, lose weight, be healthier, make more money, or whatever it is you want for 2020.

Be positive!

Make a promise to yourself to be as positive as you can possibly be.  Make a promise to yourself to be more positive than you’ve ever been in your life.  At the beginning of each day promise yourself: “Today, wherever I go and whatever I’m doing, I will be positive!”

Being positive means that you will look for the positive things in people, circumstances, and all things.

Being positive means that if any negative words come out of your mouth, you will stop mid-sentence and immediately turn the sentence into a positive one.

Being positive means that you will have fewer negative emotions, and even if a negative emotion arises you will be positive about it too by allowing the negative emotion to be rather than trying to push it away.

Being positive means that you will automatically focus on what you want, not on what you don’t want.

Being positive means that you will become an attractive force for what you want.

Being positive means that negative thoughts and words will begin to fall away.

Being positive means that you will begin to feel happier and happier each day.

Being positive means that you will have fewer problems.

Being positive means that life will go smoothly for you, everyday events will fall into place, and things will go your way.

Being positive means that you will feel good!

Make a commitment to change your entire life in 2020 through the simple, singular act of being positive!

Wishing you a Happy, Positive New Year for 2020!

                                                                                                                      — Rhonda Byrne

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klXj198vY4A

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfFZtn2MU4A

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[If we had to ‘sail into the mystic’  to get to here … then WHERE are we NOW? ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLHq8V1V-aw[:]

Posted on 3 Comments

[:en]Christmas 2019[:]

[:en] 

 

Jesus came here –  to reveal the Father … and not just for us, but for the people of some 6,000 other worlds in Nebadon (and eventually, I guess, the full 10,000 worlds of his creation, which by and by will be “inhabited”.  A world is not counted as ‘inhabited’ until such time as there are God-knowing people living there … that is – ‘adjuster-indwelt’.)

 

[Sometime you should read the ‘adjuster papers’ in the Urantia Book – (papers 107-111).  Everyone should.]

 

Anyway, there was a certain incident (which you may not know about) – involving Jesus and the young John Mark (who years later wrote the Gospel of Mark)

Just two days before the (well-known) Last Supper, Jesus had decided to take himself off into the hills alone to prepare himself for the (tremendous) ordeal which he knew awaited him. 

[Incidentally, Jesus had been informed 8 months earlier (on the Mount of the Transfiguration) –  that the requirements for his final bestowal had been met; and he could have elected to end his bestowal THEN.  But he chose not to do this.   If you wish to read about this transaction (on your own) … it’s here :

https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-158-mount-transfiguration?term=%22158%22#U158_0_0      ]

 

Anyway, despite Jesus’ plan to go alone into the hills … John Mark gets Jesus to take him along!

 

THAT’S the way God is!       [Wonderful!      Amazing! ]

 

Have a look –

 

https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-177-wednesday-rest-day?term=%22177%22#U177_0_0  :

The Urantia Book

Paper 177

Wednesday, the Rest Day

177:0.1 (1920.1) WHEN the work of teaching the people did not press them, it was the custom of Jesus and his apostles to rest from their labors each Wednesday. On this particular Wednesday they ate breakfast somewhat later than usual, and the camp was pervaded by an ominous silence; little was said during the first half of this morning meal. At last Jesus spoke: “I desire that you rest today. Take time to think over all that has happened since we came to Jerusalem and meditate on what is just ahead, of which I have plainly told you. Make sure that the truth abides in your lives, and that you daily grow in grace.”

177:0.2 (1920.2) After breakfast the Master informed Andrew that he intended to be absent for the day and suggested that the apostles be permitted to spend the time in accordance with their own choosing, except that under no circumstances should they go within the gates of Jerusalem.

177:0.3 (1920.3) When Jesus made ready to go into the hills alone, David Zebedee accosted him, saying: “You well know, Master, that the Pharisees and rulers seek to destroy you, and yet you make ready to go alone into the hills. To do this is folly; I will therefore send three men with you well prepared to see that no harm befalls you.” Jesus looked over the three well-armed and stalwart Galileans and said to David: “You mean well, but you err in that you fail to understand that the Son of Man needs no one to defend him. No man will lay hands on me until that hour when I am ready to lay down my life in conformity to my Father’s will. These men may not accompany me. I desire to go alone, that I may commune with the Father.”

177:0.4 (1920.4) Upon hearing these words, David and his armed guards withdrew; but as Jesus started off alone, John Mark came forward with a small basket containing food and water and suggested that, if he intended to be away all day, he might find himself hungry. The Master smiled on John and reached down to take the basket.

1. One Day Alone with God

177:1.1 (1920.5) As Jesus was about to take the lunch basket from John’s hand, the young man ventured to say: “But, Master, you may set the basket down while you turn aside to pray and go on without it. Besides, if I should go along to carry the lunch, you would be more free to worship, and I will surely be silent. I will ask no questions and will stay by the basket when you go apart by yourself to pray.”

177:1.2 (1920.6) While making this speech, the temerity of which astonished some of the near-by listeners, John had made bold to hold on to the basket. There they stood, both John and Jesus holding the basket. Presently the Master let go and, looking down on the lad, said: “Since with all your heart you crave to go with me, it shall not be denied you. We will go off by ourselves and have a good visit. You may ask me any question that arises in your heart, and we will comfort and console each other. You may start out carrying the lunch, and when you grow weary, I will help you. Follow on with me.”

177:1.3 (1921.1) Jesus did not return to the camp that evening until after sunset. The Master spent this last day of quiet on earth visiting with this truth-hungry youth and talking with his Paradise Father. This event has become known on high as “the day which a young man spent with God in the hills.” Forever this occasion exemplifies the willingness of the Creator to fellowship the creature. Even a youth, if the desire of the heart is really supreme, can command the attention and enjoy the loving companionship of the God of a universe, actually experience the unforgettable ecstasy of being alone with God in the hills, and for a whole day. And such was the unique experience of John Mark on this Wednesday in the hills of Judea.

177:1.4 (1921.2) Jesus visited much with John, talking freely about the affairs of this world and the next. John told Jesus how much he regretted that he had not been old enough to be one of the apostles and expressed his great appreciation that he had been permitted to follow on with them since their first preaching at the Jordan ford near Jericho, except for the trip to Phoenicia. Jesus warned the lad not to become discouraged by impending events and assured him he would live to become a mighty messenger of the kingdom.

177:1.5 (1921.3) John Mark was thrilled by the memory of this day with Jesus in the hills, but he never forgot the Master’s final admonition, spoken just as they were about to return to the Gethsemane camp, when he said: “Well, John, we have had a good visit, a real day of rest, but see to it that you tell no man the things which I told you.” And John Mark never did reveal anything that transpired on this day which he spent with Jesus in the hills.

177:1.6 (1921.4) Throughout the few remaining hours of Jesus’ earth life John Mark never permitted the Master for long to get out of his sight. Always was the lad in hiding near by; he slept only when Jesus slept.

2. Early Home Life

177:2.1 (1921.5) In the course of this day’s visiting with John Mark, Jesus spent considerable time comparing their early childhood and later boyhood experiences. Although John’s parents possessed more of this world’s goods than had Jesus’ parents, there was much experience in their boyhood which was very similar. Jesus said many things which helped John better to understand his parents and other members of his family. When the lad asked the Master how he could know that he would turn out to be a “mighty messenger of the kingdom,” Jesus said:

177:2.2 (1921.6) “I know you will prove loyal to the gospel of the kingdom because I can depend upon your present faith and love when these qualities are grounded upon such an early training as has been your portion at home. You are the product of a home where the parents bear each other a sincere affection, and therefore you have not been overloved so as injuriously to exalt your concept of self-importance. Neither has your personality suffered distortion in consequence of your parents’ loveless maneuvering for your confidence and loyalty, the one against the other. You have enjoyed that parental love which insures laudable self-confidence and which fosters normal feelings of security. But you have also been fortunate in that your parents possessed wisdom as well as love; and it was wisdom which led them to withhold most forms of indulgence and many luxuries which wealth can buy while they sent you to the synagogue school along with your neighborhood playfellows, and they also encouraged you to learn how to live in this world by permitting you to have original experience. You came over to the Jordan, where we preached and John’s disciples baptized, with your young friend Amos. Both of you desired to go with us. When you returned to Jerusalem, your parents consented; Amos’s parents refused; they loved their son so much that they denied him the blessed experience which you have had, even such as you this day enjoy. By running away from home, Amos could have joined us, but in so doing he would have wounded love and sacrificed loyalty. Even if such a course had been wise, it would have been a terrible price to pay for experience, independence, and liberty. Wise parents, such as yours, see to it that their children do not have to wound love or stifle loyalty in order to develop independence and enjoy invigorating liberty when they have grown up to your age.

177:2.3 (1922.1) “Love, John, is the supreme reality of the universe when bestowed by all-wise beings, but it is a dangerous and oftentimes semiselfish trait as it is manifested in the experience of mortal parents. When you get married and have children of your own to rear, make sure that your love is admonished by wisdom and guided by intelligence.

177:2.4 (1922.2) “Your young friend Amos believes this gospel of the kingdom just as much as you, but I cannot fully depend upon him; I am not certain about what he will do in the years to come. His early home life was not such as would produce a wholly dependable person. Amos is too much like one of the apostles who failed to enjoy a normal, loving, and wise home training. Your whole afterlife will be more happy and dependable because you spent your first eight years in a normal and well-regulated home. You possess a strong and well-knit character because you grew up in a home where love prevailed and wisdom reigned. Such a childhood training produces a type of loyalty which assures me that you will go through with the course you have begun.”

177:2.5 (1922.3) For more than an hour Jesus and John continued this discussion of home life. The Master went on to explain to John how a child is wholly dependent on his parents and the associated home life for all his early concepts of everything intellectual, social, moral, and even spiritual since the family represents to the young child all that he can first know of either human or divine relationships. The child must derive his first impressions of the universe from the mother’s care; he is wholly dependent on the earthly father for his first ideas of the heavenly Father. The child’s subsequent life is made happy or unhappy, easy or difficult, in accordance with his early mental and emotional life, conditioned by these social and spiritual relationships of the home. A human being’s entire afterlife is enormously influenced by what happens during the first few years of existence.

177:2.6 (1922.4) It is our sincere belief that the gospel of Jesus’ teaching, founded as it is on the father-child relationship, can hardly enjoy a world-wide acceptance until such a time as the home life of the modern civilized peoples embraces more of love and more of wisdom. Notwithstanding that parents of the twentieth century possess great knowledge and increased truth for improving the home and ennobling the home life, it remains a fact that very few modern homes are such good places in which to nurture boys and girls as Jesus’ home in Galilee and John Mark’s home in Judea, albeit the acceptance of Jesus’ gospel will result in the immediate improvement of home life. The love life of a wise home and the loyal devotion of true religion exert a profound reciprocal influence upon each other. Such a home life enhances religion, and genuine religion always glorifies the home.

177:2.7 (1923.1) It is true that many of the objectionable stunting influences and other cramping features of these olden Jewish homes have been virtually eliminated from many of the better-regulated modern homes. There is, indeed, more spontaneous freedom and far more personal liberty, but this liberty is not restrained by love, motivated by loyalty, nor directed by the intelligent discipline of wisdom. As long as we teach the child to pray, “Our Father who is in heaven,” a tremendous responsibility rests upon all earthly fathers so to live and order their homes that the word father becomes worthily enshrined in the minds and hearts of all growing children.

~~~~~~~~

 

Let us NOT get tangled up in details.

I expect it’s true – that our reckoning (as to when Jesus came here) is flawed.  Jesus was born (in Bethlehem) in the summer … not in December. In fact by our calendar, he was born in August of 7 BC !

But these are details.   Mmm?

Keep in mind (as you make decisions as to what to do … on this Christmas Day (or on any other, subsequent day) – that there are certain ‘events’ for which (as Joseph Campbell points out) – it does NOT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT IT HAPPENED.  What matters is – that it’s ALWAYS HAPPENING.

So

It is in THIS light that I wish to suggest – that it is our task … to tend to ourselves … to prepare ourselves to receive the Christ.   —

 

 

 

Balulalow           

                                                                                     

O my deare hert, young Jesu sweit,                                (Oh my dear heart, young Jesus sweet)

Prepare thy creddil in my spreit,                                                 (Prepare your cradle in my spirit)

And I sall rock thee to my hert,                                                  (And I shall rock you to my heart)

And never mair from thee depart.                                               (And nevermore from you depart)

 

But I sall praise thee evermoir                                                        (But I shall praise you forever)

With sanges sweit unto thy gloir;                                                  (With sweet songs of your glory)

The knees of my heart sall I bow,                                            (The knees of my heart I shall bend)

And sing that richt Balulalow!                                                                 (And sing that right lullaby)

 

[Here’s the music]

                                     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBdVJ46Cj_0

 

[This, by the way, is one of the songs from “A Ceremony of Carols”  by Benjamin Britten]

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

 

And here is an excerpt –  from Paper 100 (of the Urantia Book)

 

https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-100-religion-in-human-experience?term=%22acme%20of%20religious%20living%22#U100_7_0    :

7. The Acme of Religious Living

100:7.1 (1101.5) Although the average mortal of Urantia cannot hope to attain the high perfection of character which Jesus of Nazareth acquired while sojourning in the flesh, it is altogether possible for every mortal believer to develop a strong and unified personality along the perfected lines of the Jesus personality. The unique feature of the Master’s personality was not so much its perfection as its symmetry, its exquisite and balanced unification. The most effective presentation of Jesus consists in following the example of the one who said, as he gestured toward the Master standing before his accusers, “Behold the man!”

100:7.2 (1101.6) The unfailing kindness of Jesus touched the hearts of men, but his stalwart strength of character amazed his followers. He was truly sincere; there was nothing of the hypocrite in him. He was free from affectation; he was always so refreshingly genuine. He never stooped to pretense, and he never resorted to shamming. He lived the truth, even as he taught it. He was the truth. He was constrained to proclaim saving truth to his generation, even though such sincerity sometimes caused pain. He was unquestioningly loyal to all truth.

100:7.3 (1101.7) But the Master was so reasonable, so approachable. He was so practical in all his ministry, while all his plans were characterized by such sanctified common sense. He was so free from all freakish, erratic, and eccentric tendencies. He was never capricious, whimsical, or hysterical. In all his teaching and in everything he did there was always an exquisite discrimination associated with an extraordinary sense of propriety.

100:7.4 (1102.1) The Son of Man was always a well-poised personality. Even his enemies maintained a wholesome respect for him; they even feared his presence. Jesus was unafraid. He was surcharged with divine enthusiasm, but he never became fanatical. He was emotionally active but never flighty. He was imaginative but always practical. He frankly faced the realities of life, but he was never dull or prosaic. He was courageous but never reckless; prudent but never cowardly. He was sympathetic but not sentimental; unique but not eccentric. He was pious but not sanctimonious. And he was so well-poised because he was so perfectly unified.

100:7.5 (1102.2) Jesus’ originality was unstifled. He was not bound by tradition or handicapped by enslavement to narrow conventionality. He spoke with undoubted confidence and taught with absolute authority. But his superb originality did not cause him to overlook the gems of truth in the teachings of his predecessors and contemporaries. And the most original of his teachings was the emphasis of love and mercy in the place of fear and sacrifice.

100:7.6 (1102.3) Jesus was very broad in his outlook. He exhorted his followers to preach the gospel to all peoples. He was free from all narrow-mindedness. His sympathetic heart embraced all mankind, even a universe. Always his invitation was, “Whosoever will, let him come.”

100:7.7 (1102.4) Of Jesus it was truly said, “He trusted God.” As a man among men he most sublimely trusted the Father in heaven. He trusted his Father as a little child trusts his earthly parent. His faith was perfect but never presumptuous. No matter how cruel nature might appear to be or how indifferent to man’s welfare on earth, Jesus never faltered in his faith. He was immune to disappointment and impervious to persecution. He was untouched by apparent failure.

100:7.8 (1102.5) He loved men as brothers, at the same time recognizing how they differed in innate endowments and acquired qualities. “He went about doing good.”

100:7.9 (1102.6) Jesus was an unusually cheerful person, but he was not a blind and unreasoning optimist. His constant word of exhortation was, “Be of good cheer.” He could maintain this confident attitude because of his unswerving trust in God and his unshakable confidence in man. He was always touchingly considerate of all men because he loved them and believed in them. Still he was always true to his convictions and magnificently firm in his devotion to the doing of his Father’s will.

100:7.10 (1102.7) The Master was always generous. He never grew weary of saying, “It is more blessed to give than to receive.” Said he, “Freely you have received, freely give.” And yet, with all of his unbounded generosity, he was never wasteful or extravagant. He taught that you must believe to receive salvation. “For every one who seeks shall receive.”

100:7.11 (1102.8) He was candid, but always kind. Said he, “If it were not so, I would have told you.” He was frank, but always friendly. He was outspoken in his love for the sinner and in his hatred for sin. But throughout all this amazing frankness he was unerringly fair.

100:7.12 (1102.9) Jesus was consistently cheerful, notwithstanding he sometimes drank deeply of the cup of human sorrow. He fearlessly faced the realities of existence, yet was he filled with enthusiasm for the gospel of the kingdom. But he controlled his enthusiasm; it never controlled him. He was unreservedly dedicated to “the Father’s business.” This divine enthusiasm led his unspiritual brethren to think he was beside himself, but the onlooking universe appraised him as the model of sanity and the pattern of supreme mortal devotion to the high standards of spiritual living. And his controlled enthusiasm was contagious; his associates were constrained to share his divine optimism.

100:7.13 (1103.1) This man of Galilee was not a man of sorrows; he was a soul of gladness. Always was he saying, “Rejoice and be exceedingly glad.” But when duty required, he was willing to walk courageously through the “valley of the shadow of death.” He was gladsome but at the same time humble.

100:7.14 (1103.2) His courage was equaled only by his patience. When pressed to act prematurely, he would only reply, “My hour has not yet come.” He was never in a hurry; his composure was sublime. But he was often indignant at evil, intolerant of sin. He was often mightily moved to resist that which was inimical to the welfare of his children on earth. But his indignation against sin never led to anger at the sinner.

100:7.15 (1103.3) His courage was magnificent, but he was never foolhardy. His watchword was, “Fear not.” His bravery was lofty and his courage often heroic. But his courage was linked with discretion and controlled by reason. It was courage born of faith, not the recklessness of blind presumption. He was truly brave but never audacious.

100:7.16 (1103.4) The Master was a pattern of reverence. The prayer of even his youth began, “Our Father who is in heaven, hallowed be your name.” He was even respectful of the faulty worship of his fellows. But this did not deter him from making attacks on religious traditions or assaulting errors of human belief. He was reverential of true holiness, and yet he could justly appeal to his fellows, saying, “Who among you convicts me of sin?”

100:7.17 (1103.5) Jesus was great because he was good, and yet he fraternized with the little children. He was gentle and unassuming in his personal life, and yet he was the perfected man of a universe. His associates called him Master unbidden.

100:7.18 (1103.6) Jesus was the perfectly unified human personality. And today, as in Galilee, he continues to unify mortal experience and to co-ordinate human endeavors. He unifies life, ennobles character, and simplifies experience. He enters the human mind to elevate, transform, and transfigure it. It is literally true: “If any man has Christ Jesus within him, he is a new creature; old things are passing away; behold, all things are becoming new.”

~~~~                [“Urantia” is what the celestials call this planet (which we call ‘Earth’) ]

 

I am told – that I (personally) knew Jesus (in the first century when he was here) … but that I failed to recognize him as a divine son.  I was (unfortunately) too full of myself … too taken with the greatness of my own intellect.

What a loss !

 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Some Children See Him

                                                                                  –      Wihla Hutson and Alfred Burt

Some children see Him lily white,

the baby Jesus born this night.

Some children see Him lily white,

with tresses soft and fair.

Some children see Him bronzed and brown,

The Lord of heav’n to earth come down.

Some children see Him bronzed and brown,

with dark and heavy hair.

Some children see Him almond-eyed,

this Savior whom we kneel beside.

some children see Him almond-eyed,

with skin of yellow hue.

Some children see Him dark as they,

sweet Mary’s Son to whom we pray.

Some children see him dark as they,

and, ah! they love Him, too! 

The children in each different place

will see the baby Jesus’ face

like theirs, but bright with heavenly grace,

and filled with holy light.

O lay aside each earthly thing

and with thy heart as offering,

come worship now the infant King.

‘Tis love that’s born tonight!

 

[Here’s the music  –

 

                                             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_3-haTEFrU

 

When I was a kid (in northwest Ohio) I had an older and a younger brother.  And every Christmas (from before I was born) our parents sent out (maybe a hundred) “Christmas cards”   … which were, each year – a photo of the family.

Dad knew a little photography, and would take these himself, develop the negative, put it in the enlarger, and expose the sheets of photographic paper.  Then (when we got old enough to help) we would develop these ourselves in trays in the dark room which Dad had put together in the corner of the basement … [red light, moving the photos from tray to tray … the smell of acetic acid]  Then these were mailed to friends & family. Black & whites, of course.

But Alfred Burt (who wrote the music to the above song) … would (as his ‘Christmas card’ each year) – write a Christmas carol … and (somehow) send it out to his friends.        How about THAT ?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

We often say (or we hear it said) – that  “if only we could be as loving ALL YEAR … as we are at Christmas” …

But –  let’s NOT give up on that too glibly.

The FACT that we (the people of this Earth) are ABLE to function at (this) Higher Level of Consciousness   (if only for a couple days, at Christmas) … MEANS  – that we are CAPABLE  of it.

Mmm?

 

Intention is a powerful thing.

 

Rumi says –

 

                     Love is a bridge between you … and everything.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 [:]

Posted on 6 Comments

[:en]Christmas: Music & some Context[:]

[:en] 

Little tree

little silent Christmas tree

you are so little

you are more like a flower

who found you in the green forest

and were you very sorry to come away?

see i will comfort you

because you smell so sweetly

i will kiss your cool bark

and hug you safe and tight

just as your mother would,

only don’t be afraid

look the spangles

that sleep all the year in a dark box

dreaming of being taken out and allowed to shine,

the balls the chains red and gold the fluffy threads,

put up your little arms

and i’ll give them all to you to hold

every finger shall have its ring

and there won’t be a single place dark or unhappy

then when you’re quite dressed

you’ll stand in the window for everyone to see

and how they’ll stare!

oh but you’ll be very proud

and my little sister and i will take hands

and looking up at our beautiful tree

we’ll dance and sing

“Noel Noel”

                                             – e.e. cummings (1894-1962)

 

 

 

 

 

I have always loved Christmas.  I grew up in semi-rural northwest Ohio.  The church our family went to was close enough that we always walked.  A Methodist church. When I was little, it was a white frame building with an outdoor toilet.  When I was about 12, this (small) wooden church with a steeple (across from the Township House, where we would go for Sunday School) was torn down, once a larger brick building was built – just to the east.  This new church had indoor plumbing; the bathroom smelled much better.

But we were still in the old church, when I began singing in the choir.  (There was no children’s choir.) My mom, who sang alto in the choir, informed me one day that I would be singing in the choir.  This seemed outrageous to me and ‘out of the question’. I was very upset. I cried about it. It never occurred to me, however, that I could decline this invitation.  So I did it. There were no other children in the choir. But I soon found out that – I could do it … and that I liked it.  This choir had some very talented singers; and the songs were mainly enjoyable.  It was fun.

 

Christmas songs, though, are special.  Many of them are (truly) inspired works.  Did you know that G. F. Handel refused to accept payment for his “composition” of the Hallelujah Chorus (which is the ending of “The Messiah”).  He says the room was full of angels; and he just wrote down what he heard them sing.

 

There are quite a few ‘Christmas songs’ which I do not really care for.  Mainly because I feel they do not carry the (real) Christmas Spirit.  If you happen to feel the same way, you may wish to make use of these (following) songs this year –

 

[The fifth one (Feliz Navidad  – dance recital) is not here because it is a Christmas song, but because of the (priceless) dance performance of the children.  A few others in the list are not actually Christmas songs at all, yet I include them. The fourth one (Túrót eszik a cigány  – Kodaly) is about Gypsies; but it is proclamatory, and exultant.  The tenth one (Wexford Lullaby  – John Renbourn) is not a Christmas song (though its tune became the Wexford Carol); but it is Human and deep and luminous.  A couple dozen in, (Sacla’ – school lunch) is not a Christmas song; but it is wonderful – dramatically and musically;  and it’s Education on a very high level. Four further in, (La Nuit – from ‘Les Choristes’) is about the Night; but it’s essential energy is excellent.  

These are from last year’s Christmas blog – https://worldfamilytrading.com/Christmas/  .  

And, of course, there’s a chance you may wish to make use of the ‘ritual’ (w/ readings) which I put there. ]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_3-haTEFrU   (Some Children See Him)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L_Yc-rWHvQ    (The Blessed Son of God  – Ralph Vaughan Williams)  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3s-Q1zyxYE   (Balulalow, Britten)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPpYEHwq-u8        (Túrót eszik a cigány  – Kodaly)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPFvJgQqZb0     (Feliz Navidad  – dance recital)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBDFMD5kLvc    (Carol of the Bells  – Ukrainian)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwEp6F3GLkA    (Отче наш, Otche Nash, Lord’s Prayer, Our Father – Slavonic Hymn)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyFkPd6fEuI    (Hymn of the Cherubim  – Tchaikovsky)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxDZjg_Igoc   (Yo-Yo Ma, Alison Krauss – The Wexford Carol)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts4AxTD7ctc    (Wexford Lullaby  – John Renbourn)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifCWN5pJGIE    (Mary, Did you Know?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Zx9JA2DOow    (Lullay Myn Lyking, Holst)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0mT-zNxRMw    (African version of Little Drummer Boy)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKzkCldvB-w    (God is Love  – Goethe and Holst)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU-E46o0sp0    (Lo, How a Rose E’re Blooming)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6IG6F6E5Ac    (The Huron Carol)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJRzB-buX0k    (The Huron Carol, Christmas at Saint Marie [45 minutes])

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjaN7DB7Pd4    (Past Three O’Clock)

.youtube.com/watch?v=SGeC_8VA4h8    (Adam Lay Ybounden  – Westminster Choir)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6S6EXxL_Lw    (Bring a Torch, Jeanette, Isabella      & Patapan)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nABowLcQlHc    (A Soalin’  – P P & M)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fpspzcrlGY    (The Boar’s Head Carol)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNgCM7zp30M    (Sacla’  – school lunch)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wit-jGD4wCw    (Coventry Carol  – ANÚNA)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4fMbPMdWs4     (This Little Babe – Britten – the Julie Gaulke ‘Choir’)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=999slUsTCpw    (Fum Fum Fum)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vel-9_wA_WQ    (La Nuit  – from ‘Les Choristes’)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTQKU6uUBjU    (O Holy Night)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYstefPL8VI    (I Wonder As I Wander  – Eleni Voudouraki)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3iYnHx8P0s    (The Lord’s Prayer (Our Father): A Russian Orthodox Liturgical Work by Nikolay Kedrov, Sr.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td7OlabxlXY   (Good King Wenceslas – King’s College Choir  – Prague Christmas)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c95ikxkv0KQ    (ГЕНДЕЛЬ  – “Аллилуйя”)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IEuxKCB6o8    (A Ceremony of Carols  – Benjamin Britten)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYVoAKvDsLU    (Angels We Have Heard on High)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RlMuRYvndU    (Angels We Have Heard on High  [w/ stained glass church windows])

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRDtZeJzLi8    (Silent Night,  Celtic)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_6XMMzHZ7c    (I Wonder As I Wander  – McDermid)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzQO4L_OKQA    (Mary, Did You Know?  – The Hound + The Fox)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYvw7jm-lsw    (Praise the Lord  – Rachmaninov)

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgFyokgV1Ls    (“Our Father”  – Rimsky-Korsakov)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTQKU6uUBjU    (O Holy Night  – Libera)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBOMVLd7wYg    (Russian Orthodox)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGR4Lj8cpYs    (Carol of the Bells   [using real bells])

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lwqdyVJuYA    (The Holly and the Ivy)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbJ-X_-1YbQ    (What Child Is This?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1hegkE9Lb0    (Angels We Have Heard On High) 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGI4cqItD6U&index=2&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw    (God Rest Ye Merry, Gentlemen)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYoAhVW4B4g&index=4&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw    (Bring a Torch, Jeannette, Isabella)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6Xt5SjHbBA&index=7&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw    (Good King Wenceslas)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTsknFSV-Zk&index=9&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw    (In the Bleak Midwinter)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv9-m-xDvwk&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw&index=5    (Good Christian Men, Rejoice)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojTtfocIbVU&index=6&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw    (Coventry Carol)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIA7uYQX2HA&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw&index=17    (Oh Come Oh Come Emmanuel)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1ZOGTPsxng&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw&index=31    (We Three Kings)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3raTXZ_hPk&index=29&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw   (And the Glory of the Lord) 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-Rv-J46gvM&list=RD6miZpGUjbfw&index=30   (The Angel Gabriel [Old Basque Carol])

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[movie:  “The God Child Came”   (DVD available from   https://globalchangetools.org/collections/video)]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

But four decades after my (happy) beginnings with real choral singing (at the old Shawnee Methodist Church) … I found myself in a religious order in Arizona.  And I did that work there for 17 years. It was not easy. Global Community Communications Alliance is not a resort – (a place where rich people go to relax and have fun).  For one thing – everyone attends evening classes; so I learned some things (mainly, from my Urantia Book studies). And, while what I learned there did not essentially change my understanding of Christmas, it enlarged and contextualized Christmas for me.  And (because we are all Family) I wish to offer you some of that information.

 

The Grand Universe is big … and old … and full of many orders of beings (and we are familiar with only a few of these)      We happen to be familiar with Jesus (of Nazareth). But long before he was born as a babe in Bethlehem, he was begotten (in single ‘birth’) – a being of Paradise origin.  Of the order of Michael. (because there was an original one, whose name was Michael. And so, all others of that order are said to be of the Order of Michael. These are the Creator Sons.  There are (more than) 700,000 of such beings. Each (of the 700,000) are commissioned (along with a Creative Daughter) to create an entire “Universe” (comprised of 10,000 habitable worlds, and all the beings inhabiting them)  In our universe (of Nebadon – which is approximately the Milky Way galaxy) Jesus Christ Michael (and his complement, our Universe Mother Spirit) are our spiritual parents. He is “God” in this universe. And such a divine pair rule their universe (the 10,000 worlds of their creation).  

But

Prior to assuming full sovereignty of his universe, a creator son must bestow himself in the likeness of seven of the (different orders of the) creatures of their own making.  And they are given some latitude (with respect to which orders they will incarnate as, and in what order … except that) it is a standard requirement – that the 7th (& final) bestowal – be as a Human.  (as it is understood that the human life is the most difficult).  Also (though they are permitted to show up as a mature being, of whatever order, in the first six bestowals) …  in the 7th bestowal, they are required to be born as a (helpless, human) baby.

Besides this, each creator son must take an oath – swearing that they will NOT assume full sovereignty of their (already created) universe … till fully completing the seven (requisite) bestowal lives, and then being granted full approval.  (Never has it happened, in the long history of the Grand Universe – that a Creator Son DID assume sovereignty of his universe prematurely. But it COULD be done; so, the vow is required.)

[ref:  The Urantia Book, Paper 119 (p. 1308) – The Bestowals of Christ Michael]

 

Once a Creator Son has gone through all seven of the requisite bestowal lives (and have been fully approved) … they are given permission to assume full sovereignty of their Universe … after which there’s a big party (on the universe headquarters world), at which the creator son publicly acknowledges his complement as his equal.

And after this, he becomes a Master Son. He is reckoned as a new order of being.

 

A Michael Son chooses the time and planet of his various (required) bestowals.  In our case, Jesus Christ Michael chose (for his 7th & final bestowal) to incarnate on Urantia (the Earth) at the time of the Adamic default (about 37,000 years ago … that is,he showed up here 2,000 years ago, but he made his choice at the time of Adam & Eve.).  As this planet had already suffered a rebellion (a few hundred thousand years earlier – the “Lucifer Rebellion”) he knew (with the additional hardship of the Adamic default) that this planet would be in considerable darkness … affording a “good backdrop” for his bestowal.

But I think it should also be noted – that in the whole long history of the Grand Universe … this is the only time – that a creator son was killed by his own creatures (during a bestowal life).  And because of this extraordinary and outrageous occurrence, this planet has become known (among our neighboring inhabited planets) as “The World of the Cross”.                                     [ref: Urantia Book, p. 2016]

 

Even so … this is a Bestowal Planet.  And Christmas (2019, by our reckoning) is one week away.  Let us all do what we can do – to prepare ourselves for the upcoming Planetary Event … when the whole Earth will (for a day or two) upshift … and we’ll be in the First Stage of Light & Life.

 

It’s a real thing.  We can all feel it.[:]

Posted on 11 Comments

[:en]Collective Consciousness[:]

[:en] 

There are ways in which we are (ALL of us) already a Family.  Our connection with each other through Collective Consciousness … is one.

 

I spent four years at Maharishi International University (1976 – 1980).  It’s a Liberal Arts school where everyone (staff, students, faculty) participates regularly in the Transcendental Meditation Technique.  (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi brought TM to the west. The school is now named Maharishi University of Management)

Those years were among the ‘best’ in my life.  Wonderful people. A VERY uplifting environment.

And during those (4) years I was impressed (on numerous occasions) with the power and efficacy of the spiritual practices, which in that place, are made use of by all.

And – I learned some things.  One of which is – that (not only is consciousness a Real Thing, but) Collective Consciousness is also.

I was (it seems to me) forced to this conclusion by the research that was done then (on consciousness).  It was during that time when I was a student there – that a group of Governors of the Age of Enlightenment (that’s someone who is a TM teacher who is also a practitioner of the TM Sidhis Program.)  Anyway, during those days, a group of Governors went off to Atlanta, Georgia. When they arrived, they went to the Police Department and inquired as to what district of the city was experiencing the most crime.  Then they found (and rented) a facility (where they could, together, do their Program) and they simply DID their spiritual practices for a time (a week or two). Then again checked in with the Police. And they were told that crime in their area had gone down.  They inquired – “Where is crime the worst NOW?” And they were told. Then they found a new facility (in that new district) and again (simply) did their practices. And the crime (again) lessened in THAT district. They did this several times. And always with the same result..  And from THIS report, I felt I MUST conclude – that Collective Consciousness is REAL. (And the fact that it is evidently distance sensitive makes me wonder if it is also, like Newton’s “strength of gravitational force” subject to the “inverse square law” [that the force will vary inversely with the square of the distance … which, by the way, is simply how the intensity of light or sound will vary, farther from its source – according to the geometry of Expanding Spheres.  That’s all that is.])

 

Later I spent 17 years in a Religious Order in Arizona (Global Community Communications Alliance  < gcca.org > ) where I happened to learn that (while this IS a Fallen World) we nonetheless (every year, for a day or two, at Christmas time) shift into a categorically higher level of consciousness.  The ENTIRE planet. At that time, people (MANY people) are thinking of Others. They are thinking of God, and how God CAME to us (rascals). During those (perhaps two) days – we are living in the First Stage of Light & Life.  The Consciousness of the Whole of Humanity … SHIFTS onto a higher level.

 

And THAT is what contextualizes (makes sense of) the phenomena which have been mythologized and known as the Christmas Truce.  

(And, while I doubt that it occurred only in the First World War … I am so far unsuccessful in finding reports from other wars.  Reports then [especially in 1914, early in the war] are numerous.)

 

Most of the time, we are able to believe we have Enemies; and War somewhat makes sense to us.  But NOT AT CHRISTMAS. Christmas does not know : “Enemies & Hatred”.  It knows Love. It IS Love.

 

These Christmas Truces happen – because, at that time – WE are different.  Part of a Higher level of consciousness.  Mmm ?

 

We are now two weeks away from Christmas.  We’re well into Advent. But NOT because it’s a ‘church matter’ …  it seems to me a good thing – that we prepare ourselves spiritually.  So that we can contribute to our being (even briefly) in the First Stage of Light & Life … and so that we can enjoy it.                       (And perhaps, by and by … we’ll be able to sustain it.)

 

You may want to watch (besides “It’s a Wonderful Life”) … the film “Joyeux Noël” (2005), which is a fictional depiction of a 1914 Christmas Truce.  

                                                                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyeux_No%C3%ABl

 

And you may wish to read a bit about the Christmas Truces –

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_truce

 

[As a courtesy, I’ll include much from these articles at the end of this essay.]

 

Also, you may want to look at what I’ve written before on these matters –

 

https://worldfamilytrading.com/blog/page/6/   

&

https://worldfamilytrading.com/christmas/

 

I should warn you that in the film Joyeux Noël (early in the movie) there is a sex scene … which I would not let my kids watch.  For adult viewers, I think it’s quite okay. Good even. But sex is not for kids. To sexualize them prematurely would be unkind and irresponsible.  (Humans have Mirror Neurons, you know. We empathize well. Probably don’t let your kids watch that particular bedroom scene.)

 

You may want to make use of the ritual … and/or the songs published with last year’s blog.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Joyeux Noël

 

Joyeux Noël (”Merry Christmas”) is a 2005 epic war drama film based on the Christmas truce of December 1914, depicted through the eyes of French, Scottish, and German soldiers. It was written and directed by Christian Carion,[2] and screened out of competition at the 2005 Cannes Film Festival.[3]

The film, which includes one of the last appearances of Ian Richardson before his death, was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film at the 78th Academy Awards. It is a fictionalised account of an actual event that took place in December 1914, when Wilhelm, German Crown Prince, sent the lead singer of the Berlin Imperial Opera company on a solo visit to the front line. Singing by the tenor, Walter Kirchhoff, to the 120th and 124th Württemberg regiments led French soldiers in their trenches to stand up and applaud.[4]

Contents

Plot[edit]

The story centres mainly upon six characters: Gordon (a Lieutenant of the Royal Scots Fusiliers); Audebert (a French Lieutenant in the 26th Infantry and reluctant son of a general); Horstmayer (a Jewish German Lieutenant of the 93rd Infantry); Father Palmer (a Scottish priest working as a chaplain and stretcher-bearer); and two famous opera stars, German tenor Nikolaus Sprink and his Danish fiancée, mezzo-soprano Anna Sørensen.

The film begins with scenes of schoolboys reciting patriotic speeches that both praise their countries and condemn their enemies. In Scotland, two young brothers, Jonathan and William, join up to fight, followed by their priest, Father Palmer, who becomes a chaplain. In Germany, Sprink is interrupted during a performance by a German officer announcing a reserve call up. French soldier Audebert looks at a photograph of his pregnant wife, whom he has had to leave behind (in the occupied part of France, just in front of his trench), and prepares to exit into the trenches for an Allied assault on German lines. However the assault fails, with the French and Scottish taking many casualties while William loses his life.

In Germany, Anna gets permission to perform for Crown Prince Wilhelm, and Sprink is allowed to accompany her. They spend a night together and then perform. Afterward, Sprink expresses bitterness at the comfort of the generals at their headquarters, and resolves to go back to the front to sing for the troops. Sprink initially opposes Anna’s decision to go with him, but he agrees shortly afterward.

The unofficial truce begins when the Scots begin to sing festive songs and songs from home, accompanied by bagpipes. Sprink and Sørensen arrive on the German front line, and Sprink sings for his comrades. As Sprink sings “Silent Night“, he is accompanied by Father Palmer’s bagpipes from the Scottish front line. Sprink responds to Palmer and exits his trench with a small Christmas tree, singing “Adeste Fideles“. Following Sprink’s lead Audebert, Horstmayer, and Gordon meet in no-man’s-land and agree on a cease-fire for the evening.

The various soldiers meet and wish each other “Joyeux Noël”, “Frohe Weihnachten”, and “Merry Christmas”. They exchange chocolate, champagne, and photographs of loved ones. Horstmayer gives Audebert back his wallet containing a photograph of his wife, which was lost in the attack a few days prior, and they connect over pre-war memories. Father Palmer celebrate a brief Mass for the soldiers (in Latin as was the practice in the Catholic Church at that time), and the soldiers retire deeply moved. However, Jonathan remains totally unmoved by the events around him, choosing to grieve for his brother. The following morning, the Lieutenants agree to extend the truce to allow each side to bury their dead, followed by cordial fraternisation for the rest of the day.

In the meantime, Horstmayer learns that Anna and Sprink left without the German superior’s assent to entertain fellow front soldiers and informs both that Sprink is going to be arrested for disobedience. Anna and Sprink then ask Audebert to take them as captives, in order to avoid separation.

Father Palmer is being sent back to his own parish and his battalion is disbanded as a mark of shame. Despite emphasising the humanity and goodwill of the truce, he is rebuked by the bishop, who then preaches an anti-German sermon to new recruits, in which he describes the Germans as inhumane and commands the recruits to kill every one of them. Father Palmer overhears the sermon and removes his cross as he leaves.

Back in the trenches, the Scots are ordered by a furious major (who is angered by the truce) to shoot a German soldier who is entering no-man’s-land and crossing towards French lines. All of the soldiers deliberately miss in response, except the bitter Jonathan, whose shoots the targeted German soldier. Audebert, hearing the familiar alarm clock ringing outside, rushes out and discovers that the soldier is a disguised Ponchel, his batman. With his dying words, Ponchel reveals he gained help from the German soldiers, visited his mother, and had coffee with her. He also informs Audebert that he has a young son named Henri.

Audebert is punished by being sent to Verdun, and he receives a dressing down from his father, a general. In a culminating rant, young Audebert upbraids his father, expressing no remorse at the fraternisation at the front, and his disgust for civilians and superiors who talk of sacrifice but know nothing of the struggle in the trenches. He also informs the general about his new grandson Henri. Moved by this revelation, the general then recommends they “both try and survive this war for him”.

Horstmayer and his troops, who are confined in a train, are informed by the German Crown Prince that they are to be shipped to the Eastern Front, without permission to see their families as they pass through Germany. He then stomps on Jörg’s harmonica and says that Horstmayer does not deserve his Iron Cross. As the train departs, the Germans start humming a Scottish carol they learned from the Scots, “L’Hymne des Fraternisés/ I’m Dreaming of Home”.

Cast[edit]

Critical reception[edit]

Stephen Holden, film critic for The New York Times, liked the motion picture and wrote, “If the film’s sentiments about the madness of war are impeccably high-minded, why then does Joyeux Noël …feel as squishy and vague as a handsome greeting card declaring peace on earth? Maybe it’s because the kind of wars being fought in the 21st century involve religious, ideological and economic differences that go much deeper and feel more resistant to resolution than the European territorial disputes and power struggles that precipitated World War I… Another reason is that the movie’s cross-section of soldiers from France, Scotland and Germany are so scrupulously depicted as equal-opportunity peacemakers that they never come fully to life as individuals.”[5]

Critic Roger Ebert also wrote about the sentimentality of the film, “Joyeux Noël has its share of bloodshed, especially in a deadly early charge, but the movie is about a respite from carnage, and it lacks the brutal details of films like Paths of Glory …Its sentimentality is muted by the thought that this moment of peace actually did take place, among men who were punished for it, and who mostly died soon enough afterward. But on one Christmas, they were able to express what has been called, perhaps too optimistically, the brotherhood of man.”[6]

Adaptations[edit]

Kevin Puts’ 2011 opera Silent Night is based on the Joyeux Noël screenplay.[7]

Ratings[edit]

The film was originally rated R in the USA. However, after Ebert criticised the rating, the MPAA officially changed the rating to PG-13.[original research?]

Soundtrack[edit]

Awards[edit]

Wins

Nominations

  • Academy Awards: Oscar, Best Foreign Language Film of the Year, France; 2006.
  • Golden Globes: Golden Globe, Best Foreign Language Film, France; 2006.
  • British Academy of Film and Television Arts: BAFTA Film Award, Best Film not in the English Language, Christophe Rossignon and Christian Carion; 2006.
  • César Awards, France: César, Best Costume Design (Meilleurs costumes), Alison Forbes-Meyler; Best Film (Meilleur film), Christian Carion; Best Music Written for a Film (Meilleure musique), Philippe Rombi; Best Production Design (Meilleurs décors), Jean-Michel Simonet; Best Supporting Actor (Meilleur second rôle masculin), Dany Boon; Best Writing – Original (Meilleur scénario original), Christian Carion; 2006.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Christmas truce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigation

Jump to search

An artist’s impression from The Illustrated London News of 9 January 1915: “British and German Soldiers Arm-in-Arm Exchanging Headgear: A Christmas Truce between Opposing Trenches”

A cross, left in Saint-Yves (Saint-Yvon – Ploegsteert; Comines-Warneton in Belgium) in 1999, to commemorate the site of the Christmas Truce. The text reads:

“1914 – The Khaki Chum’s Christmas Truce – 1999 – 85 Years – Lest We Forget”

The Christmas truce (German: Weihnachtsfrieden; French: Trêve de Noël) was a series of widespread unofficial ceasefires along the Western Front of World War I around Christmas 1914.

The truce occurred during the relatively early period of the war (month 5 of 51). Hostilities had lulled as leadership on both sides reconsidered their strategies following the stalemate of the Race to the Sea and the indecisive result of the First Battle of Ypres. In the week leading up to the 25th, French, German, and British soldiers crossed trenches to exchange seasonal greetings and talk. In some areas, men from both sides ventured into no man’s land on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day to mingle and exchange food and souvenirs. There were joint burial ceremonies and prisoner swaps, while several meetings ended in carol-singing. Men played games of football with one another,[1] creating one of the most memorable images of the truce. Fighting continued in some sectors, while in others the sides settled on little more than arrangements to recover bodies.

The following year, a few units arranged ceasefires but the truces were not nearly as widespread as in 1914; this was, in part, due to strongly worded orders from the high commands of both sides prohibiting truces. Soldiers were no longer amenable to truce by 1916. The war had become increasingly bitter after devastating human losses suffered during the battles of the Somme and Verdun, and the use of poison gas.

The truces were not unique to the Christmas period, and reflected a mood of “live and let live“, where infantry close together would stop overtly aggressive behaviour and often engage in small-scale fraternisation, engaging in conversation or bartering for cigarettes. In some sectors, there were occasional ceasefires to allow soldiers to go between the lines and recover wounded or dead comrades; in others, there was a tacit agreement not to shoot while men rested, exercised or worked in view of the enemy. The Christmas truces were particularly significant due to the number of men involved and the level of their participation—even in very peaceful sectors, dozens of men openly congregating in daylight was remarkable—and are often seen as a symbolic moment of peace and humanity amidst one of the most violent events of human history.

Contents

Background[edit]

During the first eight months of World War I, the German attack through Belgium into France had been repelled outside Paris by French and British troops at the Battle of the Marne in early September 1914. The Germans fell back to the Aisne valley, where they prepared defensive positions. In the subsequent Battle of the Aisne, the Allied forces were unable to push through the German line, and the fighting quickly degenerated into a stalemate; neither side was willing to give ground, and both started to develop fortified systems of trenches. To the north, on the right of the German army, there had been no defined front line, and both sides quickly began to try to use this gap to outflank one another. In the ensuing “Race to the Sea“, the two sides repeatedly clashed, each trying to push forward and threaten the end of the other’s line. After several months of fighting, during which the British forces were withdrawn from the Aisne and sent north into Flanders, the northern flank had developed into a similar stalemate. By November, there was a continuous front line running from the North Sea to the Swiss frontier, occupied on both sides by armies in prepared defensive positions.[2]

In the lead up to Christmas 1914, there were several peace initiatives. The Open Christmas Letter was a public message for peace addressed “To the Women of Germany and Austria“, signed by a group of 101 British women suffragettes at the end of 1914 as the first Christmas of World War I approached.[3][4] Pope Benedict XV, on 7 December 1914, had begged for an official truce between the warring governments.[5] He asked “that the guns may fall silent at least upon the night the angels sang.”[6] This attempt was officially rebuffed.[7]

Fraternisation[edit]

Main article: Live and let live

Fraternisation—peaceful and sometimes friendly interactions between opposing forces—was a regular feature in quiet front-line sectors of the Western Front. In some areas, it manifested as a passive inactivity, where both sides would refrain from overtly aggressive or threatening behaviour, while in other cases it extended to regular conversation or even visits from one trench to another.[8]

Truces between British and German units can be dated to early November 1914, around the time opposing armies had begun static trench warfare. At this time, both sides’ rations were brought up to the front line after dusk, and soldiers on both sides noted a period of peace while they collected their food.[9] By 1 December, a British soldier could record a friendly visit from a German sergeant one morning “to see how we were getting on”.[10] Relations between French and German units were generally more tense, but the same phenomenon began to emerge. In early December, a German surgeon recorded a regular half-hourly truce each evening to recover dead soldiers for burial, during which French and German soldiers exchanged newspapers.[11] This behaviour was often challenged by junior and senior officers; the young Charles de Gaulle wrote on 7 December of the “lamentable” desire of French infantrymen to leave the enemy in peace, while the commander of 10th Army, Victor d’Urbal, wrote of the “unfortunate consequences” when men “become familiar with their neighbours opposite”.[11] Other truces could be enforced on both sides by weather conditions, especially when trench lines flooded in low-lying areas,[11] though these often lasted after the weather had cleared.[12] On the Eastern Front, Fritz Kreisler reported incidents of spontaneous truces and fraternisation between the Austro-Hungarians and Russians in the first few weeks of the war.[13]

The proximity of trench lines made it easy for soldiers to shout greetings to each other, and this may have been the most common method of arranging informal truces during 1914.[14] Men would frequently exchange news or greetings, helped by a common language; many German soldiers had lived in England, particularly London, and were familiar with the language and the culture. Several British soldiers recorded instances of Germans asking about news from the football leagues, while other conversations could be as banal as discussions of the weather or as plaintive as messages for a sweetheart.[15] One unusual phenomenon that grew in intensity was music; in peaceful sectors, it was not uncommon for units to sing in the evenings, sometimes deliberately with an eye towards entertaining or gently taunting their opposite numbers. This shaded gently into more festive activity; in early December, Sir Edward Hulse of the Scots Guards wrote that he was planning to organise a concert party for Christmas Day, which would “give the enemy every conceivable form of song in harmony” in response to frequent choruses of Deutschland Über Alles.[16]

Christmas 1914[edit]

British and German troops meeting in no man’s land during the unofficial truce (British troops from the Northumberland Hussars, 7th Division, Bridoux-Rouge Banc Sector)

Roughly 100,000 British and German troops were involved in the unofficial cessations of hostility along the Western Front.[17] The first truce started on Christmas Eve 1914, when German troops decorated the area around their trenches in the region of Ypres, Belgium and particularly in Saint-Yvon (called Saint-Yves, in Plugstreet/Ploegsteert – Comines-Warneton), where Capt. Bruce Bairnsfather described the truce.[18]

The Germans placed candles on their trenches and on Christmas trees, then continued the celebration by singing Christmas carols. The British responded by singing carols of their own. The two sides continued by shouting Christmas greetings to each other. Soon thereafter, there were excursions across No Man’s Land, where small gifts were exchanged, such as food, tobacco and alcohol, and souvenirs such as buttons and hats. The artillery in the region fell silent. The truce also allowed a breathing spell where recently killed soldiers could be brought back behind their lines by burial parties. Joint services were held. In many sectors, the truce lasted through Christmas night, continuing until New Year’s Day in others.[7]

On Christmas Day, Brigadier-General Walter Congreve, then commanding 18 Infantry Brigade, stationed near Neuve Chapelle, wrote a letter recalling the Germans initiated by calling a truce for the day. One of his brigade’s men bravely lifted his head above the parapet and others from both sides walked onto no man’s land. Officers and men shook hands and exchanged cigarettes and cigars, one of his captains “smoked a cigar with the best shot in the German army”, the latter no more than 18 years old. Congreve admitted he was reluctant to personally witness the scene of the truce for fear he would be a prime target for German snipers.[19]

Bruce Bairnsfather, who served throughout the war, wrote:

I wouldn’t have missed that unique and weird Christmas Day for anything…. I spotted a German officer, some sort of lieutenant I should think, and being a bit of a collector, I intimated to him that I had taken a fancy to some of his buttons…. I brought out my wire clippers and, with a few deft snips, removed a couple of his buttons and put them in my pocket. I then gave him two of mine in exchange…. The last I saw was one of my machine gunners, who was a bit of an amateur hairdresser in civil life, cutting the unnaturally long hair of a docile Boche, who was patiently kneeling on the ground whilst the automatic clippers crept up the back of his neck.[20][21]

Future nature writer Henry Williamson, then a nineteen-year-old private in the London Rifle Brigade, wrote to his mother on Boxing Day:

Dear Mother, I am writing from the trenches. It is 11 o’clock in the morning. Beside me is a coke fire, opposite me a ‘dug-out’ (wet) with straw in it. The ground is sloppy in the actual trench, but frozen elsewhere. In my mouth is a pipe presented by the Princess Mary. In the pipe is tobacco. Of course, you say. But wait. In the pipe is German tobacco. Haha, you say, from a prisoner or found in a captured trench. Oh dear, no! From a German soldier. Yes a live German soldier from his own trench. Yesterday the British & Germans met & shook hands in the Ground between the trenches, & exchanged souvenirs, & shook hands. Yes, all day Xmas day, & as I write. Marvellous, isn’t it?[22]

Captain Sir Edward Hulse reported how the first interpreter he met from the German lines was from Suffolk, where he[who?] had left his girlfriend and a 3.5 hp motorcycle. Hulse described a sing-song which “ended up with ‘Auld lang syne‘ which we all, English, Scots, Irish, Prussians, Württenbergers, etc, joined in. It was absolutely astounding, and if I had seen it on a cinematograph film I should have sworn that it was faked!”[23]

Captain Robert Patrick Miles, King’s Shropshire Light Infantry, who was attached to the Royal Irish Rifles recalled in an edited letter that was published in both the Daily Mail and the Wellington Journal & Shrewsbury News in January 1915, following his death in action on 30 December 1914:

Friday (Christmas Day). We are having the most extraordinary Christmas Day imaginable. A sort of unarranged and quite unauthorized but perfectly understood and scrupulously observed truce exists between us and our friends in front. The funny thing is it only seems to exist in this part of the battle line – on our right and left we can all hear them firing away as cheerfully as ever. The thing started last night – a bitter cold night, with white frost – soon after dusk when the Germans started shouting ‘Merry Christmas, Englishmen’ to us. Of course our fellows shouted back and presently large numbers of both sides had left their trenches, unarmed, and met in the debatable, shot-riddled, no man’s land between the lines. Here the agreement – all on their own – came to be made that we should not fire at each other until after midnight tonight. The men were all fraternizing in the middle (we naturally did not allow them too close to our line) and swapped cigarettes and lies in the utmost good fellowship. Not a shot was fired all night.

Of the Germans he wrote: “They are distinctly bored with the war…. In fact, one of them wanted to know what on earth we were doing here fighting them.” The truce in that sector continued into Boxing Day; he commented about the Germans, “The beggars simply disregard all our warnings to get down from off their parapet, so things are at a deadlock. We can’t shoot them in cold blood…. I cannot see how we can get them to return to business.”[24]

On Christmas Eve and Christmas Day (24 and 25 December) 1914, Alfred Anderson’s unit of the 1st/5th Battalion of the Black Watch was billeted in a farmhouse away from the front line. In a later interview (2003), Anderson, the last known surviving Scottish veteran of the war, vividly recalled Christmas Day and said:

I remember the silence, the eerie sound of silence. Only the guards were on duty. We all went outside the farm buildings and just stood listening. And, of course, thinking of people back home. All I’d heard for two months in the trenches was the hissing, cracking and whining of bullets in flight, machinegun fire and distant German voices. But there was a dead silence that morning, right across the land as far as you could see. We shouted ‘Merry Christmas’, even though nobody felt merry. The silence ended early in the afternoon and the killing started again. It was a short peace in a terrible war.[25]

Nor were the observations confined to the British. German Lieutenant Johannes Niemann wrote: “grabbed my binoculars and looking cautiously over the parapet saw the incredible sight of our soldiers exchanging cigarettes, schnapps and chocolate with the enemy.”[26]

General Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien, commander of the British II Corps, issued orders forbidding friendly communication with the opposing German troops.[17] Adolf Hitler, then a young corporal of the 16th Bavarian Reserve Infantry, was also an opponent of the truce.[17]

In the Comines sector of the front there was an early fraternization between German and French soldiers in December 1914, during a short truce,[27] and there are at least two other testimonials, from French soldiers, of similar behaviours in sectors where German and French companies opposed each other. Gervais Morillon wrote to his parents: ‘The Boches waved a white flag and shouted “Kamarades, Kamarades, rendez-vous.” When we didn’t move they came towards us unarmed, led by an officer. Although we are not clean they are disgustingly filthy. I am telling you this but don’t speak of it to anyone. We must not mention it even to other soldiers.’ Gustave Berthier wrote: ‘On Christmas Day the Boches made a sign showing they wished to speak to us. They said they didn’t want to shoot. … They were tired of making war, they were married like me, they didn’t have any differences with the French but with the English.’[28][29]

In sections of the front where German and Belgian troops faced each other in December 1914, there was at least one such instance when a truce was achieved at the request of Belgian soldiers who wished to send letters back to their families, over the German-occupied parts of their own country.[30]

Richard Schirrmann, who was in a German regiment holding a position on the Bernhardstein, one of the mountains of the Vosges, wrote an account of events in December 1915: “When the Christmas bells sounded in the villages of the Vosges behind the lines… something fantastically unmilitary occurred. German and French troops spontaneously made peace and ceased hostilities; they visited each other through disused trench tunnels, and exchanged wine, cognac and cigarettes for Westphalian black bread, biscuits and ham. This suited them so well that they remained good friends even after Christmas was over.” He was separated from the French troops by a narrow No Man’s Land and described the landscape as: “Strewn with shattered trees, the ground ploughed up by shellfire, a wilderness of earth, tree-roots and tattered uniforms.” Military discipline was soon restored, but Schirrmann pondered over the incident, and whether “thoughtful young people of all countries could be provided with suitable meeting places where they could get to know each other.” He went on to found the German Youth Hostel Association in 1919.[31]

Football matches[edit]

Many accounts of the battle involve one or more football matches played in no-man’s land. This was mentioned in some of the earliest reports, with a letter written by a doctor attached to the Rifle Brigade, published in The Times on 1 January 1915, reported “a football match… played between them and us in front of the trench”.[32] A wide range of similar stories have been told over the years, often naming specific units or a precise score. Some accounts of the game bring in elements of fiction by Robert Graves, a British poet and writer (and an officer on the front at the time)[33] who reconstructed the encounter in a story published in 1962; in Graves’s version, the score was 3–2 to the Germans.[32]

However, the truth of the accounts has been disputed by some historians; in 1984, Malcolm Brown and Shirley Seaton concluded that there were probably attempts to play organised matches which failed due to the state of the ground, but that the contemporary reports were either hearsay or refer to “kick-about” matches with “made-up footballs” such as a bully-beef tin.[34] Chris Baker, former chairman of The Western Front Association and author of The Truce: The Day the War Stopped[35] is also sceptical, but says that although there is little hard evidence, the most likely place that an organised match could have taken place was near the village of Messines: “There are two references to a game being played on the British side, but nothing from the Germans. If somebody one day found a letter from a German soldier who was in that area, then we would have something credible.”[36] In fact, there is a German reference. Lieutenant Kurt Zehmisch of Germany’s 134th Saxons Infantry Regiment said that the English “brought a soccer ball from their trenches, and pretty soon a lively game ensued. How marvelously wonderful, yet how strange it was”.[37] In 2011, Mike Dash concluded that “there is plenty of evidence that football was played that Christmas Day—mostly by men of the same nationality, but in at least three or four places between troops from the opposing armies”.[32]

A wide variety of units were reported in contemporary accounts to have taken part in games; Dash listed the 133rd Royal Saxon Regiment pitched against “Scottish troops”; the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders against unidentified Germans (with the Scots reported to have won 4–1); the Royal Field Artillery against “Prussians and Hanovers” near Ypres; and the Lancashire Fusiliers, based near Le Touquet, with the specific detail of a bully beef ration tin as the “ball”.[32] One recent writer has identified 29 separate reports of football, though does not give substantive details.[38] Colonel J. E. B. Seely recorded in his diary for Christmas Day that he had been “Invited to football match between Saxons and English on New Year’s Day”, but this does not appear to have taken place.[39]

Eastern Front[edit]

A separate manifestation of the Christmas truce in December 1914 occurred on the Eastern front, where the first move originated from the Austro-Hungarian commanders, at some uncertain level of the military hierarchy. The Russians responded positively and soldiers eventually met in no man’s land.[40]

Public awareness[edit]

The events of the truce were not reported for a week, in an unofficial press embargo which was eventually broken by The New York Times, published in the then-neutral United States, on 31 December. The British papers quickly followed, printing numerous first-hand accounts from soldiers in the field, taken from letters home to their families, and editorials on “one of the greatest surprises of a surprising war”. By 8 January pictures had made their way to the press, and both the Mirror and Sketch printed front-page photographs of British and German troops mingling and singing between the lines. The tone of the reporting was strongly positive, with the Times endorsing the “lack of malice” felt by both sides and the Mirror regretting that the “absurdity and the tragedy” would begin again.[41]

Coverage in Germany was more muted, with some newspapers strongly criticising those who had taken part, and no pictures published. In France, meanwhile, the greater level of press censorship ensured that the only word that spread of the truce came from soldiers at the front or first-hand accounts told by wounded men in hospitals.[42] The press was eventually forced to respond to the growing rumours by reprinting a government notice that fraternising with the enemy constituted treason, and in early January an official statement on the truce was published, claiming it had happened on restricted sectors of the British front, and amounted to little more than an exchange of songs which quickly degenerated into shooting.[43]

The press of then-neutral Italy published a few articles on the events of the truce, usually reporting the articles of the foreign press.[44] On 30 December 1914, Corriere della Sera printed a report about a fraternization between the opposing trenches.[45] The Florentine newspaper La Nazione published a first-hand account about a football match played in the no man’s land.[46] In Italy, the lack of interest in the truce probably depended on the occurrence of other events, such as the Italian occupation of Vlorë, the debut of the Garibaldi Legion on the front of the Argonne and, finally, the earthquake in Avezzano.

Later truces[edit]

British and German troops burying the bodies of those killed in the attack of 18 December.

After Christmas 1914, sporadic attempts were made at seasonal truces; a German unit attempted to leave their trenches under a flag of truce on Easter Sunday 1915, but were warned off by the British opposite them, and later in the year, in November, a Saxon unit briefly fraternised with a Liverpool battalion. In December 1915, there were explicit orders by the Allied commanders to forestall any repeat of the previous Christmas truce. Individual units were encouraged to mount raids and harass the enemy line, whilst communicating with the enemy was discouraged by artillery barrages along the front line throughout the day. The prohibition was not completely effective, however, and a small number of brief truces occurred.[47][48]

An eyewitness account of one truce, by Llewelyn Wyn Griffith, recorded that after a night of exchanging carols, dawn on Christmas Day saw a “rush of men from both sides… [and] a feverish exchange of souvenirs” before the men were quickly called back by their officers, with offers to hold a ceasefire for the day and to play a football match. It came to nothing, as the brigade commander threatened repercussions for the lack of discipline, and insisted on a resumption of firing in the afternoon.[49] Nevertheless, another member of Griffith’s battalion, Bertie Felstead, later recalled that one man had produced a football, resulting in “a free-for-all; there could have been 50 on each side”, before they were ordered back.[50][51] Another unnamed participant reported in a letter home: “The Germans seem to be very nice chaps, and said they were awfully sick of the war.”[52] In the evening, according to Robert Keating, another eyewitness, “The Germans were sending up star lights and singing – they stopped, so we cheered them & we began singing Land of Hope and GloryMen of Harlech et cetera – we stopped and they cheered us. So we went on till the early hours of the morning.”[53]

In an adjacent sector, a short truce to bury the dead between the lines led to official repercussions; a company commander, Sir Iain Colquhoun of the Scots Guards, was court-martialled for defying standing orders to the contrary. While he was found guilty and reprimanded, the punishment was annulled by General Haig and Colquhoun remained in his position; the official leniency may perhaps have been because his wife’s uncle was H. H. Asquith, the Prime Minister.[54][55]

In the Decembers of 1916 and 1917, German overtures to the British for truces were recorded without any success.[56] In some French sectors, singing and an exchange of thrown gifts was occasionally recorded, though these may simply have reflected a seasonal extension of the live-and-let-live approach common in the trenches.[57]

At Easter 1915 there were recorded instances of truces between Orthodox troops of opposing sides on the Eastern front. The Bulgarian writer Yordan Yovkov, serving as an officer near the Greek border at the Mesta river, witnessed one such truce. It inspired his short story “Holy Night”, translated into English in 2013 by Krastu Banaev.[58]

On 24 May 1915, ANZAC and Turkish troops at Gallipoli agreed to a 9 hour truce to retrieve and bury their dead, during which opposing troops “exchang(ed) smiles and cigarettes“.[59]

Legacy and historical significance[edit]

British and German descendants of Great War veterans

Although the popular tendency has been to see the December 1914 Christmas Truces as unique and therefore of romantic rather than political significance, they have also been interpreted as part of the widespread spirit of non-co-operation with the war and conduct by serving soldiers.[60] In his book on trench warfare, historian Tony Ashworth describes what he calls the ‘live and let live system’. Complicated local truces and agreements not to fire at each other were developed by men along the front throughout the war. These often began with agreement not to attack each other at tea, meal or washing times, and in some places became so developed that whole sections of the front would see few casualties for extended periods of time. This system, Ashworth argues, ‘gave soldiers some control over the conditions of their existence.’[61] The December 1914 Christmas Truces then can be seen as not unique, but as the most dramatic example of spirit of non-co-operation with the war that included refusal to fight, unofficial truces, mutinies, strikes, and peace protests.

  • In the 1933 play Petermann schließt Frieden oder Das Gleichnis vom deutschen Opfer (Petermann makes peace: or, the parable of German sacrifice), written by Nazi writer and World War I veteran Heinz Steguweit [de], a German soldier, accompanied by Christmas carols sung by his comrades, erects an illuminated Christmas tree between the trenches, but is shot dead by the enemy. Later, when the fellow soldiers find his body, they notice in horror that enemy snipers have shot down every single Christmas light from the tree.[62]
  • The 1967 song “Snoopy’s Christmas” by the Royal Guardsmen was based on the Christmas truce. It is the Red Baron, Germany’s ace pilot and war hero, who initiates the truce with the fictitious Snoopy.
  • The 1969 film Oh! What a Lovely War includes a scene of a Christmas truce with British and German soldiers sharing jokes, alcohol and songs.
  • The video for the 1983 song “Pipes of Peace” by Paul McCartney depicts a fictionalised version of the Christmas truce.[63]
  • John McCutcheon‘s 1984 song, Christmas in the Trenches, tells the story of the 1914 truce through the eyes of a fictional soldier.[64] Performing the song he met German veterans of the truce.[65]
  • The final episode of the BBC television series Blackadder Goes Forth references the Christmas truce, with the main character Edmund Blackadder having played in a football match. He is also seen being annoyed at having had a goal disallowed for offside.[66]
  • The song “All Together Now” by Liverpool band The Farm took its inspiration from the Christmas Day Truce of 1914. The song has been re-recorded by The Peace Collective for release in December 2014 to mark the centenary of the event.[67]
  • The 1996 song “It Could Happen Again” by country artist Collin Raye, which tells the story of the Christmas truce, is included on his Christmas album Christmas: The Gift, with a spoken intro by Johnny Cash giving the history behind the event.
  • The 1997 song “Belleau Wood” by American country music artist Garth Brooks is a fictional account based on the Christmas truce.
  • The truce is dramatised in the 2005 French film Joyeux Noël (English: Merry Christmas), depicted through the eyes of French, British and German soldiers.[68] The film, written and directed by Christian Carion,[69] was screened out of competition at the 2005 Cannes Film Festival.[70]
  • In 2008, the truce was depicted on stage at the Pantages Theater in Minneapolis, in the radio musical drama All Is Calm: The Christmas Truce of 1914. It was created and directed by Peter Rothstein, and co-produced by Theater Latté Da and the vocal ensemble Cantus, both Minneapolis-based organisations. It has continued to play at the Pantages Theater each December since its premiere.
  • On November 12, 2011, the opera “Silent Night”, commissioned by the Minnesota Opera, had its world premiere at the Ordway Center for the Performing Arts in St. Paul, Minnesota. With libretto by Mark Campbell, based on the screenplay of the film “Joyeux Noel”, and with music by Kevin Puts, it won the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for Music, and has been performed or scheduled for more than 20 productions around the world as of 2018’s 100th anniversary of the Armistice.
  • Ahead of the centenary of the truce (December 2014), English composer Chris Eaton and singer Abby Scott produced the song, 1914 – The Carol of Christmas, to benefit British armed forces charities. At 5 December 2014, it had reached top of the iTunes Christmas chart.[71]
  • In 2014, the Northumbria and Newcastle Universities Martin Luther King Peace Committee[72] produced resources to enable schools and churches to mark the December 1914 Christmas Truces. These included lesson plans, hand-outs, worksheets, PowerPoint slide shows, and full plans for assemblies, and carol services/Christmas productions. The authors explained that their purpose was both to enable schoolteachers to help children learn about the remarkable events of December 1914, but also to use the theme of Christmas to provide a counterpoint to the UK government’s glorification of the First World War as heroic. As the Peace Committee argues, “These spontaneous acts of festive goodwill directly contradicted orders from high command, and offered an evocative and hopeful – albeit brief – recognition of shared humanity”[73] – and thereby, they argue, give a rereading of the traditional Christmas message of “on earth peace, good will toward men.”[74]
  • The grocery chain Sainsbury’s produced a short film for the 2014 Christmas season as an advertisement re-enacting the events of the Christmas truce, primarily following a young English soldier in the trenches.[75][76]
  • In the Doctor Who 2017 Christmas Special “Twice Upon a Time“, the First and Twelfth Doctors become unwittingly involved in the fate of a British captain who is seemingly destined to die in a confrontation in No Man’s Land before he is taken out of time, only for the Twelfth Doctor to bend the rules and return the captain — revealed to be an ancestor of his friend and ally Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart — to a point a couple of hours after he was taken out of time. This slight bending of the rules results in the captain being returned to history at the beginning of the Christmas truce, allowing the captain to live and request aid for his would-be killer, the Twelfth Doctor musing that such a truce was the only time such a thing happened in history but it never hurts to ensure that there will be a couple of fewer dead people on a battlefield.

Monuments[edit]

A Christmas truce memorial was unveiled in Frelinghien, France, on 11 November 2008. Also on that day, at the spot where, on Christmas Day 1914, their regimental ancestors came out from their trenches to play football, men from the 1st Battalion, The Royal Welch Fusiliers played a football match with the German Battalion 371. The Germans won 2–1.[77]

On 12 December 2014, a memorial was unveiled at the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire, England by Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and the England national football team manager Roy Hodgson.[78] The Football Remembers memorial was designed by a ten-year-old schoolboy, Spencer Turner, after a UK-wide competition.[78]

Annual re-enactments[edit]

The Midway Village in Rockford, Illinois has hosted re-enactments of the Christmas Truce.[:]